Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I use tabu to easily specify colors for different parts of my table. Also the X column makes life easier. I have some problems regarding vertical placement:

In the linked figure you can see many defects:

enter image description here

  1. First Row: Text not vertically-aligned
  2. Multiple line in the last column is not well placed. Although single line is good (Operand A)
  3. Item lists have no space above, and plenty below!

If I replaced the "X[8,m]" from the fourth column to "X[8,l]", problem 2 and 3 are fixed. But this breaks the middle alignment of the first three columns to top.

What am I missing?

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabu}
\usepackage{xcolor,colortbl}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\begin{document}

Test this

\vspace*{1cm}

\tabulinestyle{1pt blue}
\begin{tabu}[m]{
     |[1pt blue] X[2.2,m]
     |[1pt gray] X[m]
     |[1pt gray] X[m]
     |[1pt gray] X[8,m]
     |[1pt blue] } \everyrow{\tabucline[1pt gray]-}

\rowfont[C]{\bf\large\color{white}} \rowcolor{blue} Port & Width & Type & Description \\

OperandA & Mode & Input & 
Operand A  \\ 

OperandB & Mode & Input & 
Operand B in IEEE format and some constraints \\ 

Mode & 3 & Input & 
\begin{itemize}[nolistsep,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 000 Round to  
    \item 001 Round away 
    \item 010 Round toward 
    \item 011 Round toward minus 
    \item 100 Round Toward
    \item 101 Round to nearest 
    \item 110 Round to nearest 
    \item 111 Reserved 
\end{itemize} \\

Precision & 1 & Input  &
\begin{itemize}[nolistsep,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 1 Enable 64 operand
    \item 0 Enable 128 operand
\end{itemize} \\

Oper & 1 & Input & \textit{Operation selector}:
\begin{itemize}[nolistsep,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 100 bla
    \item 101 blaaa
    \item 000 
    \item 110 
    \item 111 
    \item 001 
    \item 010 
    \item 011 
\end{itemize} \\

Condition & 5 & Input & 
\textit{Comparison condition selector}: 
The valid combination are seen in standard-defined Comparisons \\ 

\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{Clock, Reset, and Enable are relevant only to pipelined designs} \\ 

Clock & 1 & Input & System Clock (relevant only to pipelined designs) \\
Reset & 1 & Input & System Asynchronous Reset, active low \\

Enable & 1 & Input & \textit{System Enable}. When Enable = 0, the Clock and Reset inputs are held \\ \tabucline[1pt blue]-\end{tabu}

\end{document}
share|improve this question
    
Have a look at my updated answer. –  Sveinung Aug 18 '12 at 9:32
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The spacing
tabu, as most other table packages, has some problem with spacing, especially when you are using list-environments. Therefore, we all longing for v 2.9. Try using \tabulinesep=1.3mm and remove the nolistsep from the two first listings (or give topsep= an small value (f.ex. 0.1ex). After \textit{Operation selector} put a \newline. Listings in tables are challenging.

I have tinkered a bit more with your code. The bad spacing around lists are not tabu’s fault, but the itemize-environment adding, in this setting, unnecessary space. I solved this by including the itemize-environment in a 5 cm wide \parbox and reducing the topsep to 0.1ex. If you have necessary skills, you may read the width of the fourth column from the .aux-file.

The problem with the heading is your setting of column 2 and 3. It is too narrow. I increased the width of these columns and the headings lined up. As @hakaze point out, only the last column need to be a X column; the cells in the three first columns are only one line. Use ordinary l- and c-column instead, and the headings line up nicely.

I also added a \strut to the first column, giving the heading more depth.

Complicated table is difficult, and you have to be prepared for fine tuning whatever package you are using.

Here is the code for a new MWE:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabu}
\usepackage{xcolor,colortbl}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage[overload]{ragged2e}

\begin{document}

\tabulinesep=3pt
\tabulinestyle{1pt blue}
\begin{tabu}[m]{
     |[1pt blue] l    % or X[2.5,m]
     |[1pt gray] c    % or X[2mc]
     |[1pt gray] l    % or X[2m]
     |[1pt gray] X[8,lm]  % I suggest to you set the column ragged right
     |[1pt blue] } \everyrow{\extrarowsep=^2pt\tabucline[1pt gray]-}

\rowfont[C]{\bf\large\color{white}} \rowcolor{blue} \strut Port &  Width & Type & Description  \\

OperandA & Mode & Input & 
Operand A  \\ 

OperandB & Mode & Input & 
Operand B in IEEE format and some constraints \\ 

Mode & 3 & Input & 
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 000 Round to  
    \item 001 Round away 
    \item 010 Round toward 
    \item 011 Round toward minus 
    \item 100 Round Toward
    \item 101 Round to nearest 
    \item 110 Round to nearest 
    \item 111 Reserved 
\end{itemize}}
\\ 

Precision & 1 & Input  &
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 1 Enable 64 operand
    \item 0 Enable 128 operand
\end{itemize}} \\

Oper & 1 & Input & \textit{Operation selector}:\newline
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
    \item 100 bla
    \item 101 blaaa
    \item 000 
    \item 110 
    \item 111 
    \item 001 
    \item 010 
    \item 011 
\end{itemize}} \\

Condition & 5 & Input & 
\textit{Comparison condition selector}: 
The valid combination are seen in standard-defined Comparisons \\ 

\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{Clock, Reset, and Enable are relevant only to pipelined designs} \\ 

Clock & 1 & Input & System Clock (relevant only to pipelined designs) \\
Reset & 1 & Input & System Asynchronous Reset, active low \\

Enable & 1 & Input & \textit{System Enable}. When Enable = 0, the Clock and Reset inputs are held \\ \tabucline[1pt blue]-\end{tabu}

\end{document}

The output:

And here is the new output

share|improve this answer
    
The table head can be fixed be fixed by using the following column layout: l c c X[m] (I left out the vertical lines for legibility). –  hakaze Aug 13 '12 at 12:39
    
Thanks a lot, I'm sorry for that too late reply. –  Tarek Eldeeb Sep 13 '12 at 15:46
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.