TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to use the command, $\sideset{_\sigma}{_f}\times$ without an error message. This command renders the way I want it to, (a times with a left subscript of \sigma, and a right subscript of f).

My issue however is that I would like to compile through this error without have to skip it. So my question is can I put a command on that line that will compile though just that line, while being able to troubleshoot around it. In particular I would like to skip a particular error. If not this, is their some other way I might be able to typeset this.


Here is the code:

\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts, xypic, mathrsfs, graphicx}


Here is the error message:

./test2.tex:7:Limit controlsmust follow a math operator.

< argument > \times \nolimits


share|improve this question
Welcome to TeX.sx! Please add a minimal working example (MWE) that illustrates your problem. What is the error message? We need to know that so that others can try to reproduce the problem and debug it. – barbara beeton Aug 18 '12 at 22:01
you can use $\sideset{{}_\sigma}{{}_f}{\mathop{\times}}$ but egreg's answer is the way to go. – percusse Aug 18 '12 at 22:07
Is the edit that I made the right kind of thing? – Baby Dragon Aug 18 '12 at 22:25
Welcome to TeX.sx! A tip: If you indent lines by 4 spaces, they'll be marked as a code sample. You can also highlight the code and click the "code" button (with "{}" on it). – percusse Aug 18 '12 at 22:34
Thank you to all. – Baby Dragon Aug 18 '12 at 22:46
up vote 4 down vote accepted

\sideset wants as its third argument an operator such as \sum; you get what you want by

share|improve this answer
See also this summary of solutions Left and right subscript – Andrew Swann Aug 19 '12 at 7:09
@AndrewSwann Here the "binary operation" nature of \times must be preserved, which isn't with \prescript. – egreg Aug 19 '12 at 10:30
I was thinking of two things: (1) the different range of possible commands listed there; (2) the vertical placing in the presence of a superscript on one side but not the other. It is good to note that any of them can be put inside \mathbin to make them into a binary operator, so e.g. one can write \( a \mathbin{\prescript{}{f}{\times}^N_f} b \) – Andrew Swann Aug 19 '12 at 17:43
@AndrewSwann The problem is that \prescript assumes the presence of a superscript, even if empty; so to get the symbol at the same height on both sides you have to supply an empty superscript: \prescript{}{\sigma}{\times}^{}_f. I'd prefer not using \prescript. – egreg Aug 19 '12 at 21:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.