Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a problem about using revtex4-1. This version does not automatically truncate long author lists anymore. So I followed the instruction I found here, I made an new .bst file through makebst and use \bibliographystyle{mybstfile}. But I got a strange result as shown in the fig. below:

all my ref. starting from [3], and I got something strange in [1] and [2].

it looks like

[1]

[2],08..

[3]normal ref. starting from here

I think, maybe revtex4-1 is written to show all the author list, so I found the older version revtex4, and use \bibliographystyle{mybstfile}, under this version and using my bst file, the ref. list is ok. However, I cannot use superscriptaddress in the documentclass, otherwise, I get the same crazy ref. list as before.

In other words, in order to have a normal ref. list, I am forced to use groupedaddress in the documentclass which will take a lot of space.

please, is there any one who can help me with this problem?

I am fine with both 4, or 4-1 version, as long as I can have a normal ref. list and superscriptaddress working properly in the same time...

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by lockstep, Joseph Wright Oct 6 '12 at 21:35

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer 1

I'm going to guess that you need to use a newer version of revtex4-1. With

Document Class: revtex4-1 2010/07/25/20:33:00 4.1r

there should not be a problem with using a \bibliographystyle{...} command, although there were problems with earlier releases.

share|improve this answer
    
I install revtex4-1 one year ago, and also re-install from authors.aps.org/revtex4/revtex4_faq.html last week. I think it must me the latest version, still, it just does not work.... –  phlinjoy Sep 17 '12 at 10:25
    
Well, what is the version in the \jobname.log file? –  Lev Bishop Sep 17 '12 at 13:34
    
I copy the beginning part of the log. file as following: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.11 (TeX Live 2010) (format=pdflatex 2010.7.21) 18 SEP 2012 15:46 entering extended mode \write18 enabled. Is it what you are referring to? file:line:error style messages enabled. –  phlinjoy Sep 18 '12 at 14:05
    
No, I need the revtex version, which should look similar to how I wrote in my answer above. –  Lev Bishop Sep 18 '12 at 14:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.