Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I just installed TeXlipse, and want to make my .tex-file alongside my Java-code (in the same Java-project). Right now, I can compile, but only to .dvi, which I dislike because of the bad viewer.

Is it possible to change the default extension to .pdf, for every project? I already tried to disable the .dvi and .ps compilers by removing their program file path, but then I'm getting the error:

Error: Builder (#0) for dvi output format has an invalid configuration: <project-name>.
share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 13 down vote accepted

If I understood your question correctly, you probably have a Java project with a .tex file somewhere. Something like the following image:

Image 1

If we save our document, TeXlipse is configured to run the TeX builder for us. Saving the document with CTRL + S will give us the following files in my doc/ subfolder:

Image 2

The default setup is to rely on latex and .dvi. In order to change this behaviour, we need to go to Project > Properties:

Image 3

Just a note: if we check the builders, we will see that the project is set to run both Java and TeX builders for us.

Image 4

Look for the LaTeX Project Properties tab:

Image 5

The following screen will appear:

Image 6

Go to the output format and change the extension from .dvi to .pdf:

Image 7

The engine will automatically change to pdflatex. Click OK.

Image 8

Every time we edit our .tex document and save it, pdflatex will be executed instead of latex, and we will have the following files in my doc/ subfolder:

Image 9

We can also see the .pdf with the embedded viewer:

Image 10

Hope it helps. :)

share|improve this answer
    
Great answer, Paulo! Unfortunately I can’t upvote, because I cannot verify it (no Eclipse user). –  Speravir Oct 10 '12 at 23:40
    
@Speravir: thanks! :) –  Paulo Cereda Oct 10 '12 at 23:58
    
What?! No, “<3”? I am very, veerry, VERY sad!!!11 ;-) –  Speravir Oct 11 '12 at 0:26
    
@Speravir: oops, my bad. <3 :) –  Paulo Cereda Oct 11 '12 at 0:38
    
Wow, great answer! Big thanks, indeed works! –  Pieter Oct 11 '12 at 17:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.