TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I posted an answer on math.se here and in there I used double dollar mode. Now in that mode, I had

\bigwedge^ \hspace{1mm} k V

but upon rendering it looks weird like

enter image description here

How can I bring the k closer to the big wedge so that it looks more normal like in single dollar mode? In single dollar mode, we have $\bigwedge^k V$ looking a lot more natural.

share|improve this question
Does this concern a document printed with TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt or just MathJax? – egreg Oct 12 '12 at 22:45
@egreg I am not sure, on math.se it is printed with MathJax but when I type up latex documents I get the same problem too, so it's probably a latex wide problem. – BenjaLim Oct 12 '12 at 22:46
You should never use $$ in LaTeX; probably \[\bigwedge\nolimits^{\!k}V\] is what you're looking for. – egreg Oct 12 '12 at 22:48
Recall that MathJax (used in Math.SE) is not LaTeX, while it uses some of its conventions. – egreg Oct 12 '12 at 22:53
@BenjaLim: See Why is \[ … \] preferable to $$? – Werner Oct 12 '12 at 22:59
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Choose one among the following inputs, in LaTeX:

\bigwedge^k V

\bigwedge\nolimits^k V

\bigwedge\nolimits^{\!k} V

The respective results are shown below

enter image description here

The first is widely used, the second appears faulty. The command \! inserts a small backspacing.

Why not using $$ in LaTeX is explained here: Why is \[ ... \] preferable to $$?

share|improve this answer

did you try the following?


(where the -3 can be fine tuned to your taste)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.