I have the following:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{nicefrac}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\begin{document}
\begin{align*}
f_X(x)&=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \exp ( -x^2/2 ) &\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \\
g(x)&=(x^2-1)/2 &\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \\
\intertext{ so}
g'(x) &= x\\
g^{-1}(y)&= \pm \sqrt{2y+1}\\
\intertext{ Then}
f_Y(y) &= \frac{f_X(g^{-1}(y))}{g'(g^{-1}(y))}\\
&= \frac{1}{|\pm \sqrt{2y+1}|} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp \left( -y-\nicefrac{1}{2} \right)\\
\intertext{where the support for $f_Y$ is $ y \in [(0-1)/2, \infty) = [-\nicefrac{1}{2} , \infty)$}
&= \frac{2}{\sqrt{2y+1}\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp \left( -y-\nicefrac{1}{2} \right) &\forall y \in [-\nicefrac{1}{2} , \infty)
\end{align*}
\end{document}
The problem is that I would like all the \forall to be aligned, but only the top 2 are, and the one on the bottom line is positioned to the left of the 2 at the top. I was under the impression that using & would cause the relevant items immediately following to be aligned, which is working fine for the = but not the \foralls.

alignenvironments is:rlrlrl…. You need an additional&in front of\forall. – Qrrbrbirlbel Oct 13 '12 at 21:31\nicefrac? The result doesn't seem good at all. – egreg Oct 13 '12 at 21:32\nicefracafter theexpthat seemed better to me. This didn't look good to me: ` \exp \left( -y-\frac{1}{2} \right)` – Robert Long Oct 13 '12 at 22:01$[-1/2,\infty)$or, less preferably,$[-\frac{1}{2},\infty)$. I'd perhaps use\frac{1}{2}in the arguments to\exp. Your usages of\leftand\rightare not needed and should be avoided here and in these situations. – egreg Oct 13 '12 at 22:01