TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It appears to be somewhat tedious work to use the glossaries package and I prefer not having an explicit dependency on Perl scripts to process my LaTeX documents. So what I would ask is, how can one format a glossary nicely, without resorting to using the glossaries package?

I guess something between how a subparagraph looks but with tabular alignment.

LaTeX newbie here. :-)

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by egreg, Claudio Fiandrino, Thorsten, diabonas, Kurt Nov 14 '12 at 18:41

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This looks probably complicated if you're new to LaTeX but Nicola Talbot has written a nice article about Creating a glossary without using an external indexing application. I for my part find glossaries not too hard to use, actually... – clemens Oct 27 '12 at 8:27
Thanks - I'll read that! I just found out that my application Texpad, has an index typesetter. So it becomes simpler to use glossaries. – Bent Rasmussen Oct 27 '12 at 8:39
You can make the "explicit dependency" an "implicit one" with programs like arara or latexmk ;) – yo' Oct 27 '12 at 8:52

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.