Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

On my Mac I am working with BibDesk to manage my literature references in LyX. Everything works just fine. Except for the following.

In BibDesk I added a certain book with a german title in which capital letters appear and it looks this way.

BibDesk Screenshot

After setting up lyx the citation in the bibliography section of my document appears this way.

LyX Screenshot

Somehow the letters f in the word Funktionen and the M in the word Modulformen were transformed to lower case, which is wrong and clearly not the same as I entered them in BibDesk.

Any idea where this comes from?

share|improve this question
    
As explained in the answers below this due to bibtex's parsing features. This difficulty of markup does not occur with biblatex/biber and could be a reason to swap to their bibliography mechanisms. –  Andrew Swann Nov 10 '12 at 18:44
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Enclose the letters that you would like preserved as uppercase in brackets, {}. If you would like to preserve the whole title, put everything within the extra pair of brackets:

{{Elliptische Funktionen und Modulformen}}

egreg points out in a comment to this answer that the following is better:

title={Elliptische {Funktionen} und {Modulformen}}

Note that there are reasons why the default behavior is what it is. There is a lot of information on this topic.

share|improve this answer
    
This saves in keystrokes, but I believe that title={Elliptische {Funktionen} und {Modulformen}} is better. –  egreg Nov 10 '12 at 17:11
    
@egreg Good to know. And is title={Elliptische {F}unktionen und {M}odulformen} even better? I don't know what the differences are. Is there source where I can read up on this? –  scottkosty Nov 10 '12 at 17:17
    
No, using {F}unktionen won't kern between the "F" and the "u", which might be worse for words starting with "To", for instance. –  egreg Nov 10 '12 at 17:18
    
@egreg Ah, that makes sense. –  scottkosty Nov 10 '12 at 17:21
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.