TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The biblatex unpublished style does not offer the eprint & eprinttype fields. Would you know how to add them (if possible).

share|improve this question
How can I use the sign "&" in the reference list in LaTex? For example "Chaos, Solitons & Fractals" – user12913 Mar 24 '12 at 15:57
If you're using biblatex, try \renewcommand*{\finalnamedelim}{\addspace\&\space}. – lockstep Mar 24 '12 at 17:24
@Roz Better post your own question separately. – Stefan Kottwitz Mar 24 '12 at 21:13
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I'm not sure if this is a good idea (a work with eprint information may be considered as "published"), but here's how to do it: In the bibliography driver for @unpublished, the bibmacro url+urdate needs to be replaced by the bibmacro doi+eprint+url (which also includes url+urldate).



%  \newunit\newblock% DELETED
%  \iftoggle{bbx:url}% DELETED
%    {\usebibmacro{url+urldate}}% DELETED
%    {}% DELETED
  \newunit\newblock% NEW
  \usebibmacro{doi+eprint+url}% NEW


  author = {Author, A.},
  year = {2001},
  title = {Alpha},
  eprint = {(eprint_information)},





share|improve this answer
thank you for the answer. It looks very sophisticated. Please, visit the following link http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00551910/fr/ to understand the relevance of my question. If you click on "Récupérer au format...bibtex" [top right], you'll see that the document is referred to as unpublished but still there is an access to arxiv [bottom of the page] with a link to a pdf file. There may be a better way to reference such documents that I am not aware of. – pluton Jan 5 '11 at 2:41
@pluton. biblatex takes a somewhat different line on 'unpublished' to the traditional BibTeX styles, reflecting the changes in publication in the internet age. So I'd agree with lockstep's comment that this really is not an 'unpublished' item in a biblatex sense. – Joseph Wright Jan 5 '11 at 8:15
@Joseph: so what should be used instead? Thanks "paperlyunpublished"? :) – pluton Jan 5 '11 at 13:44
@pluton. 'article': biblatex deals with the document type, and whether it's on dead trees or not it's still an article. – Joseph Wright Jan 5 '11 at 14:25
@Joseph: correct but the paper of interest is not related to any official journal, that's pretty much what makes it unpublished. I do not know how to reflect that. – pluton Jan 5 '11 at 14:38

This is how I do it: put the arXiv info in journaltitle (because this is how Zotero exports it) and have a biber SourceMap rewrite it, to put eprint as entrysubtype. Then it can be automatically selected with subtype=eprint as in the below example. I have to remove the awful-looking "in:", which nobody likes anyway.


% Remove IN: in articles

    % If journal title is arXiv, map to eprint
    \map{ \step[fieldsource=journaltitle,

  title = {Important unpublished paper},
  journaltitle = {arXiv:0000.0000 \[quant-ph\]},
  author = {A. N. Author},
  year = 2014,
  title = {Unimportant published paper},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Irreproducible Research},
  author = {N. O. Body},




\printbibliography[title=Publication in peer-reviewed

\printbibliography[title=Electronic preprints,subtype=eprint]

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.