TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'd like to set $1024 \times 768$ without any space between the three items. Is this possible? If so, how?

E.g., what I get is:

1024 x 768

and what I want is:


share|improve this question
It's not clear why you want this. Normally, math expressions should use the proper math operators with their predefined spacing. Some authors suggest using 1024 x 768 for dimensions of paintings and similar expressions. (So they suggest you use an x, not a \times.) – Marc van Dongen Apr 21 '13 at 3:18
@Marc, I want it because it looks better that way IMO. Not sure why anyone would want the letter x... that looks pretty sloppy. – Reid Apr 21 '13 at 3:49
up vote 36 down vote accepted

Math binary operators and relations automatically add appropriate spaces between the symbol and their operands. If you want to remove this space, you can turn the operator into a regular symbol by enclosing it in braces. For example

$1024 {\times} 768$

If you will be using this often you can also define a new command and say something like

$1024 \stimes 768$

where \stimes is a symbol version of the \times operator.

share|improve this answer
Win! Thanks so much. – Reid Aug 2 '10 at 23:16
Good answer, I'd only add 'however, you really shouldn't be doing this!' – Joseph Wright Aug 3 '10 at 7:19
That's what I tried to say with "appropriate spaces" in the first sentence, but I probably was't explicit enough. :P – Juan A. Navarro Aug 3 '10 at 7:28
@Joseph, you don't have to use it in your documents. I write documents that look the best I can make them, not ones that follow "the rules". I deliberately left out extraneous explanations and context, but it's a deliberate choice and it looks way better in my context. – Reid Apr 21 '13 at 3:51

Perhaps defining it as an ordinary math symbol might be better than just enclose it in braces and expect that would do it now and in the future. So, I would use \mathord:

share|improve this answer
As Knuth points out in the TeXbook, \mathord is strictly unnecessary in TeX, since braces do the same thing. Unless you're planning on not using TeX in the future, I don't see why you would not expect it to work in the future. – TH. Sep 19 '10 at 11:28
Generally, I prefer a clear command like \mathord over that effect of braces which a reader perhaps might not recognize. Though you're right, this effect should not be changed in the future since subformulas should remain ordinary symbols. I just don't rely on side effects. – Stefan Kottwitz Sep 19 '10 at 20:54

These answers seem overly complicated to me. I personally just use \! between symbols as in:

$W \! \rightarrow \! \mu$ 

This brings the symbols closer together. You can also use multiple in a row

$W \! \! \! \rightarrow \! \mu$ 
share|improve this answer

It seems to me that what you really want is a multiplication sign that works in text mode. You can get this by writing $\times$ or, to answer your whole question 1024$\times$768.

By the way, nice question. This is a good example of where it makes sense not to use normal math typography.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.