TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to multiply a matrix with a letter, it looks like that:


 \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
 | &  & |  \\
f_1 & \dots & f_n \\
 | &  & | \end{array}\right)  \mathcal{A} =
 \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
 | &  & |  \\
q_1 & \dots & q_n \\
 | &  & | \end{array} \right)\] 


Is there a chance, that the letter is not so small in comparison to the matrix, so that they have about the same size?

share|improve this question
Via graphicx package, you can use {\raisebox{-1.5ex}{\scalebox{3}{$\mathcal{A}$}}} but the result would not look that nice I guess. – percusse Dec 4 '12 at 18:16
hm true, it looks strange. But thanks anyway. Maybe I will stick to my old variant. – Adam Dec 4 '12 at 18:20
It would maybe look better if you reduce the size of the matrices via smallmatrix variants. – percusse Dec 4 '12 at 18:22
thanks! that does look much better!! – Adam Dec 4 '12 at 18:26

As percusse points out, you can resize it using the package graphicx:


However, I would say that it looks better "small" than "resized". That would be very inconsistent and weird. I recommend you to stuck with small $A$. However, there're few possible improvements of your code:


 \[ \begin{pmatrix}
 | &  & |  \\
f_1 & \cdots & f_n \\
 | &  & | \end{pmatrix}  \mathcal{A} =
 | &  & |  \\
q_1 & \cdots & q_n \\
 | &  & | \end{pmatrix}\] 

  • Do not use ngerman package, use babel with the appropriate option.
  • The package amsmath offers the environment pmatrix for matrices in parentheses, as well as bmatrix for [...], Bmatrix for {...}, vmatrix for |...| and Vmatrix for ||...||.
  • I'm not sure what the verical bars denote (probably a vector written in a column?) but I'm sure I would not understand it as a reader. However, I don't know how to improve it, since the context is missing. If the entries are really column vectors and you defined them properly before, I think that the reader would understand it even without the bars.
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.