TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Usually I don't mind about LaTeX's compilation speed, because a paper of less than 20 pages is compiled rather fast. However, I am working on a large document - A report with more than 80 pages. Compilation times are starting to slow me down. I saw the couple of answers here on this topic, but most of my graphics are external and I don't use Tikz. As a matter of fact, I'm not sure what's slowing the compilation down, other than the amount of text and required layout.

  1. What's your best speeding-tex-up trick, other than externalizing graphics and pre-compiling the preamble?
  2. How can I know what's slowing TeX down?
share|improve this question
Forgive me if I'm totally of-base, but isn't this a community-wiki type of question? Or am I wrong? – Canageek Oct 3 '11 at 3:47

13 Answers 13

large documents start with pages >500 ... Create a script which runs:

pdflatex -draftmode file
bibtex file # or biber
makeindex file.idx # if needed
makeindex -s style.gls ...# for glossary if needed
pdflatex -draftmode file
pdflatex file

The compilation can now be speedup if you run bibtex/makeindex/... only when there were changes in this area. Can be detected with a diff for the auxiliary files.

share|improve this answer
Couldn't the second pdflatex run also use -draftmode? – Philipp Jan 12 '11 at 12:47
@Philipp: yes, we can ... :-) – Herbert Jan 12 '11 at 13:07
you can it detect only for special cases, because I can define my own file extension and then yor Makefile cannot detect my use of makeindex or xindy or splitindex ... – Herbert Feb 16 '11 at 18:45
Just information: -draftmode can be used only for pdflatex and latex. xelatex has no such an option. – kiss my armpit Mar 14 '12 at 8:29
That's obvious ... – Herbert May 23 '12 at 12:11
up vote 44 down vote accepted

Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... Apparently, the nice todonotes package that I used dragged Tikz along with it, and introduced a major slowdown. Switching to simple marginpars gave a nice speedup. It should be noted that this package is a performance Trojan horse.

share|improve this answer
+1 for the info about "todo". However, it would be best if you don't ask questions in your answers, so please remove the last sentence (and edit your question if you want to). – Hendrik Vogt Jan 12 '11 at 11:00
@Little Bobby Tables, @Hendrik: Except that the information is incorrect: the todo package does not load tikz, although the todonotes package does. Please be careful when referring to packages by name, especially when the information is negative. – Alan Munn Jan 12 '11 at 12:34
@Alan: Oops, thanks a lot for the correction. (Incidentally, only the first "@" in a comment notifies a user. So in your case, "@Hendrik, @Little Bobby Tables" would have been the better order; this would have notified both of us since the author of the answer gets notified anyway.) – Hendrik Vogt Jan 12 '11 at 13:07
@Hendrik Thanks. How the whole "@" thing works is a bit mysterious anyway. Do I have to use the full name or will this get to you with just "@Hendrik"? – Alan Munn Jan 12 '11 at 13:29
@Alan: I've asked this on meta some time ago; there you can find the full explanation. – Hendrik Vogt Jan 12 '11 at 13:33

I think the most effective way to save time is to avoid compiling the document time and time again. Compilations are often not really needed, when we change several words or a simple equation.

For large documents, we can split them into small pieces using \include command. Then \includeonly helps us to compile the only piece we are interested in, leaving the whole compilation to the last stage.

For complex tables or graphs made by TeX, put them into seperate TeX files first to verify the code, then add them to the document.

Sometimes compilation options may affect the speed. pdflatex -interaction=batchmode foo is often faster than pdflatex foo, this avoid scrolling informations. There may be more, say, xelatex -no-pdf foo is faster than xelatex foo, if it isn't the last round.

share|improve this answer
Which one will run faster, with batchmode or nonstopmode? – kiss my armpit Mar 14 '12 at 8:03
@DamienWalters: batchmode is faster. – Leo Liu Mar 14 '12 at 9:43
Okay. Thank you. – kiss my armpit Mar 14 '12 at 9:44
related: hilbertastronaut.blogspot.com/2008/12/… – alfC Sep 17 '14 at 3:47

The most useful trick I know is: do not do textual changes and layout changes at the same time, but make a clear division between them.

I first fix up all the text issues (there is hardly any need to recompile during that cycle) and only afterwards worry about layout and page breaks. The separation means that in the second cycle, I can usually tackle more than one display problem simultaneously.

The second most useful trick I know is: buy a computer with a faster CPU.

Precompilation of the header will only save you some startup time, but does nothing for consecutive pages, so the effect diminishes as your document grows.

share|improve this answer
I agree on the separation between typing text with rare compilations, and then doing the layout several bits at a time. When I remember to apply it, it frees my mind a lot from all the thoughts about layout. – Bruno Le Floch Jan 12 '11 at 12:44
Note, that adding more RAM will normally not increase TeX's speed. I just tested a not-too-small document with many packages and had a 49 MB RAM usage of the pdflatex process (peak value) plus 47 MB file cache usage after the compilation process (I dropped the caches before the measurements). So 100 MB of free memory when the OS and all the other applications are loaded seems to be enough for most cases. The only thing that does matter is the single-core (integer) cpu speed. – Patrick Häcker May 21 '13 at 12:35
The RAM hint is more than misleading and should be removed! pdflatex is a CPU–bound process. See Tips for choosing hardware for best latex compile performance – Daniel Oct 2 '13 at 7:05

Here is a tip:

Beamer+graphics is a another time-consuming combination that I revisit every now and then when preparing presentations. What I do is keep all my graphics in a directory images that is actually a symbolic link to either images-hires or images-lowres. The latter is a script-generated directory with a copy of each image in image-hires but with a considerable resize transformation.

This process could be even smarter with a small preamble that checks the draft option of the document class and sets the correct path with \graphicspath. But I haven't done it because I didn't know this macro before and I am not very skilled at LaTeX/TeX macros and magics.

share|improve this answer
With pdflatex -draftmode file the images are not read which is useful until the very last pdflatex run. – Herbert Jan 12 '11 at 18:51
@Herbert: Is there a difference between passing -draftmode to pdflatex used to compile an input file without draft option passed to \documentclass and passing draft to \documentclass compiled with pdflatex invoked without -draftmode option? – kiss my armpit Mar 14 '12 at 7:21
the draft option is far different from using the option -draftmode. The latter didn't produce a pdf file! – Herbert Mar 14 '12 at 9:51
@Herbert: I see. Thanks. – kiss my armpit Mar 14 '12 at 12:25
Using imagemagick's convert program in a script with the -density and -quality option set to a low value is probably an easy, cross-platform, and free way to do this. – bbarker Apr 21 '14 at 17:31

Regarding your first question: the most noticeable speedup I've witnessed so far can be achieved by compiling to DVI instead of PDF. You may not be able to do that depending on the packages you use, however, but you could give it a try.

share|improve this answer
Doing so already, thanks. – Little Bobby Tables Jan 12 '11 at 15:36

Math Accents

Math accents can slow down a compilation. To speed up a document with many of these you can use the \accentedsymbol command defined in amsxtra subpackage of the amslatex package. In the example below, \vx can be used for \vect{x} but will not take the time required to place the accents (arrows on bold symbols for example). Note that since the typesetting is done out of context, some issues can arise (the size will not be small in a superscript for example), so for the final version you should redefine \accentedsymbol to simply define a macro that will get expanded everywhere in context.

%\renewcommand\accentedsymbol[2]{\def#1{#2}}  % Uncomment for final version

Note that there are limits to how many symbols you can store this way.


Not really a LaTeX issue per se, but kpathsea can be a huge performance hit if you are recursively searching directories and/or your ls-R databases are not up-to-date. You can see what it is doing by setting


before you run latex. If it is searching many places, then this can be a huge slow-down. Details can be found in the manual. (I had a huge performance hit when I accidentally recursively linked a texmf tree deep within another tree for a package I was writing.)

share|improve this answer

Personally, I use the -interaction=batchmode option to prevent verbose output. Also, for the first runs (except the last), you can use -draftmode option:

   Sets \pdfdraftmode so pdfTeX doesn't write a PDF and doesn't read 
   any included images, thus speeding up execution.

In case of error ($? -ne 0), it is sufficient to tail the log file. You can see the full code on Github.

share|improve this answer
If you don't generate a PDF how do you preview the layout? – lhf Oct 3 '12 at 2:27

When you need to iterate on something (say, the formatting of an equation), a quick and dirty but very effective trick is to comment out the bulk of the document using:


all the stuff you don't need to compile every time...


then you can focus in on the particular section you are working on, until you've got it just right with a tight edit/compile loop.

Then uncomment the rest of the document.

share|improve this answer

If you are using XeLaTeX, a substantial amount of time is spent gzipping data with highest compression (9) in the xdvipdfmx command.

~$ xdvipdfmx --help
-z number   Set zlib compression level (0-9) [9]

For me, on a 90 page document:

~$ time xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode Thesis.tex
real    0m6.056s
~$ ls -lh Thesis.pdf 
… 6,0M … Thesis.pdf

Without compression:

~$ time xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode -output-driver='xdvipdfmx -z0' Thesis.tex
real    0m2.417s
~$ ls -lh Thesis.pdf 
… 142M … Thesis.pdf

That is ~60% time saved but 23× bigger. Ok, some compression is clearly needed. My sweet spot:

~$ time xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode -output-driver='xdvipdfmx -z3' Thesis.tex
real    0m2.957s
~$ ls -lh Thesis.pdf 
… 6,9M … Thesis.pdf

That is 0.5s for compression or some 16% of the total time, as opposed to the majority of the time with default settings. I can usually live well with the 15% bigger file size. Of course, it does make sense to use -z9 for the final build.

I did not use XeTeX but assume the same scenario applies.

share|improve this answer
Welcome to TeX.SX! – egreg Aug 28 '15 at 21:26

Don't load inputenc and/or fontenc if they are not necessarily needed because:

The inputenc–fontenc combination seems slow and cumbersome, but it’s safe.

cited from Why bother with inputenc and fontenc?

share|improve this answer
This solution is only really gonna be helpful for English documents; as soon as you use about any character outside of the ASCII range, you'll need these packages. – doncherry Oct 3 '12 at 0:46

It is not about "speeding up" but "how to work when latex is really slow".

I use kile+okular.

  1. In the setting of okular uncheck "reload document on file change".
  2. Add "reload button" to the toolbar of okular

After that you can continue to read pdf file, and reload it only when it is ready.

share|improve this answer

So, What I did to handle the costly compilation is that, I first split up the document into the several chapters and every chapter into its own file, using the \input command. The main document has all the \input statements.
Inside the main_file.tex


Only the ones that are critical are not commented out. 'chapter1_results.tex' takes a lot of time to compile because of presence of figures. So I do the following, and its fast as hell.

Inside the main_file.tex

share|improve this answer
This is very similar to Leo Liu's answer. – Werner Jul 18 at 19:41
Why don't you use \includeonly as described in Leo Liu's answer? – PTNobel Jul 18 at 20:05
You are absolutely right! thanks for pointing out. I didnt know there was an \include command unitl now... I looked for \input, but didnt find it... Read the first two answers and glanced over the other comments. I should delete it right? \include makes the whole file a separate logical unit, where as \input just copy&pastes the content. I still find that commenting is easier than typing and removing \includeonly every time you need a file! I guess it might still be useful. – Thej Kiran Jul 18 at 21:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.