TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In variational calculus, the first variation is written as \delta F for some functional F. Vectors are often typeset with boldface, i.e. \vec{x} becomes \mathbf{x}. If I want to typeset the first variation of a vector, would I make the Delta bold as well?

I.e, which is "correct"? \delta \mathbf{x} or \mathbf{\delta x}?

Edit: The functional itself is scalar, but some constituents may not be. Functionals

share|improve this question
But a vector is not a functional no? Then it needs \delta F[\mathbf{x}]. Or are you considering a scalar product? – percusse Jan 5 '13 at 13:43
It seems to have nothing to do with (La)TeX. – kiss my armpit Jan 5 '13 at 15:08
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I believe the former to be the correct way. In essence you'd make the \delta a vector itself by typesetting it in bold face, which is clearly wrong. The variation constitutes more of an operator than a vector, in a similar vein with the integral or a differential for example, neither of which should be bold faced, regardless of the type of integrand. The better question in my eyes is, should you format it upright, cf. here

share|improve this answer
Good point with the upright issue. – Psirus Jan 5 '13 at 13:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.