I've already drawn too many trees with qtree, but I've discovered that I'll need tree-dvips to draw movements, and this package is incompatible with pdf. I saw that it's quite simple to draw syntactic movements with tikz-qtree. Should I switch for another package for drawing syntactic trees, once and for all? Any advice?
Tell me more
×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
I would definitely make the switch from The syntax of the two packages is identical, but with You should have minimal problems converting old trees to the new package. If you like linebreaks in node labels (which I use a lot) you should add
to your preamble, so that you can do this. |
|||
|
|
