Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am working with a program at my university that will videorecord my lectures, take my slides, and bundle them together into a movie to be put on the web, iTunesU, etc. They have asked me to produce PowerPoint slides at the standard (standard for PPT, that is) 10" by 7.5" size with a 1" margin on the top and a 2" margin on the bottom. This is to align with other logo elements put on the screen later and to allow for subtitles. I have a workflow but I'm asking if there might be a better one.

Producing PowerPoint is not going to be a big problem for me. I can use PDF2Keynote, then open in Keynote and save as PowerPoint. That might even be AppleScriptable, hm...

Instead of coercing beamer to create margins on my slides, I am thinking about using pgfpages to rescale the slide's page size and place it on the physical page with the requested margins. Then the version that I put on the projector in the classroom would not use pgfpages and wouldn't have the margins (why would it need them anyway?)

When I sent a proof-of-concept to the program coordinators they asked if I could make the left and right margins smaller. The answer is no without changing the aspect ratio of the slide. With the top and bottom margins so constrained and a 4:3 aspect ratio of the logical slide, the left and right margins have to be 2". But if I produce slides in a 16:9 ratio, scale them and place them on the page with 1" margin at the top and 2" margin at the bottom, the left and right margins will be 1". So that all works out. I'm just slightly worried it will be suboptimal in class because the projector is still 4:3 and I will have to show letterboxed slides.

Is there any part of this process that I could do a better way? I had thought about using beamerposter to set the paper size to 20.32cm by 11.43cm, then scaling all the fonts up. This might look a bit better than scaling 16cm by 9cm PDFs up to that size. But screwing with the paper size is strongly discouraged by beamer, so I don't know how much extra work that's going to cause.

share|improve this question
    
I might be being stupid, but usually this sort of thing is done by having a grab of the screen output separate from the other inputs. Otherwise things don't work when people 'break out' of slides into anything else. So surely they should be grabbing your slides when presented, not from an arbitrary source? (I'm imagining the type of presentation that River Valley do, where there is a video feed, a screen feed, audio, etc.) –  Joseph Wright Jan 22 '11 at 15:51
    
@Joseph Wright: I don't have any "usual" on which to base it but based on my conversations with the coordinator this doesn't seem to be the case. If they were just grabbing screen output then it wouldn't matter what software I used, and they insisted that I give them PowerPoint. Also, we discussed the possibility of inserting slides into the presentation after class and before post-production. So I'm pretty sure they're expecting a PowerPoint file. I'm not sure they'll know how to sync the advances, though... –  Matthew Leingang Jan 22 '11 at 18:24
    
Which beamer version do you use? Vedran has made altering the aspect ratio a bit easier, so it might be possible to get close using beamer without too much pain. –  Joseph Wright Jan 25 '11 at 12:14
    
@Joseph Wright: I'm using 3.10, which means I can use the class option aspectratio=169 to produce slides 160x90mm. –  Matthew Leingang Jan 25 '11 at 13:08
    
@Matthew. Perhaps I'm missing something, but from your description the PowerPoint aspect ratio is 4:3, so why does the rescaling onto a bigger page fail? –  Joseph Wright Jan 25 '11 at 14:04
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The method I selected was basically what I outlined in my question:

I write my beamer slides for class with the aspectratio=169 option. The projector in the room has a 4:3 aspect ratio but the letterboxing is not a noticeable issue for projection If anything it makes the slides easier to see since students in the back don't have the bottom of the screen cut off.

It is a noticeable issue for me, as I spend a lot of time rearranging slides laid out in 4:3. Also they've asked for much bigger font sizes than I normally use (72pt+ font size for the slide title?? I can't come anywhere near that close and have more than two words), but I'm working the best I can within their guidelines

For the post-production version with margins I use a pgfpages layout:

\pgfpagesdeclarelayout{NYU Open Ed margins}{}{%
    \pgfpagesphysicalpageoptions{%
        logical pages=1,%
        physical height=7.5in,
        physical width=10in
    }
    \pgfpageslogicalpageoptions{1}{%
        scale=1.27,
        center=\pgfpoint{5in}{4.25in}
    }
}

That gives a 10in x 7.5in (4:3) slide with 1in margins on top, left, and right, and 2in on the bottom. After subtracting these margins, the printable region has aspect ratio 16:9—a pretty lucky coincidence.

Then I use PDF2Keynote (free) to convert the PDF, and open it in Keynote to save as PowerPoint.

share|improve this answer
6  
I'm exhausted just reading this. :-) –  Alan Munn Feb 18 '11 at 16:40
    
Yeah, I thought participating in this program only meant that I would show up as normal. Refactoring my slides was not something I had considered. But I'm getting better. –  Matthew Leingang Feb 18 '11 at 17:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.