TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been writing using the class revtex4-1 (for the APS journals...) and have come across the following: When using footnotemark and footnotetext they each advance the footnote counter rather than only footnotetext, as in the article class. Here's a minimal example (I use nofootinbib to override the default which is to place the footnotes with the bibliography..., and the minipage is so that I can show you the output, it has no other effect):



\footnotetext{hello's text}

1+1=2 \footnotemark\label{eq:1}
\footnotetext{equations footnote}

which results in the following strange output:

alt text

Sure, I can fix it by inserting a \addtocounter{-1}{footnote} between the two commands...but I'm more interested in why this is happening, and whether its a bug.

hmmm. I just checked, it works fine with revtex4, so this is probably a bug in revtex4-1...Still, I'd like to hear your input.

share|improve this question
I'd say this is a bug: it's clearly not what you'd expect and is not in the documentation. – Joseph Wright Jan 23 '11 at 21:51
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The APS Author Guide for REVTeX 4.1 (apsguide4-1.pdf) says

Avoid custom footnotes using \footnotemark and \footnotetext [except in the context of tables (see Section VIII.5)].

So, don't do that...

share|improve this answer
hmmm. Yup. this is the correct answer. I thought I needed to use it because I wanted a footnote inside an equation...but I guess that using footnote works also inside an equation...atleast in REVTeX 4.1 Thanks! – Yossi Farjoun Jan 24 '11 at 13:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.