I have to apply a very slightly rotation to an image, a rotation of less than 1º. But it looks like all the rotation commands I've found can handle only integer angles: all the non-integer measures are truncated to a whole number. Therefore, it is impossible to get a <1º rotation.
I've tried to do the rotation with the \includegraphics, \rotatebox and the rotating package.
Any advice?
Of course, the problem is not to rotate one image but some hundreds of them. And 1º is quite relevant in a 20x20cm image inside a perfectly square frame.




\includeit? – Ethan Bolker Jan 31 at 17:56{}). Usually, we don't put a greeting or a "thank you" in our posts. While this might seem strange at first, it is not a sign of lack of politeness, but rather part of our trying to keep everything very concise. Upvoting is the preferred way here to say "thank you" to users who helped you. – Claudio Fiandrino Jan 31 at 18:03graphicx. Regardinggraphicx, the answers provided by David Carlisle do not work in my system (which happens to be XeTeX 3.1415926-2.3-0.9997.5). I don't get the same results and there is no difference between 1 and 1.5 degree rotations, neither have an explanation for this behavior. But using TikZ solves the problem, any arbitrary rotation can be performed with TikZ. – Tarasque Feb 1 at 0:45