I've read that the newtxtext and newtxmath packages are preferable to times, txfonts and mathptmx, at least for use with pdfTeX. I'm in the process of writing a paper where some measurements are given in microns (µm). Unfortunately, the \textmu (as well as \micro in siunitx) is replaced with a Computer Modern replacement.
Example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{newtxtext}
\usepackage{newtxmath}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\begin{document}
This is 10\textmu m.
\end{document}
In the compilation process, I see this:
LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `TS1/ntxrx/m/n' undefined
(Font) using `TS1/cmr/m/n' instead
(Font) for symbol `textmu' on input line 12.
and LaTeX Font Warning: Some font shapes were not available, defaults substituted.
This seems to happen with the \textohm command as well (and perhaps others I'm not using). It looks particularly bad in bold text. txfonts seems to produce output (though the mu symbol isn't quite as nice as it is with mathptmx). Using mathptmx causes compilation to fail with \textohm. Arg.
I'm wondering if there is some trick that I'm not aware of for getting \textmu (or \micro from siunitx) to work with these packages. I'm using version 1.07 of newtxtext, dated Dec 25, 2012.
Thanks.
\upmuyou get the symbol you want. – Manuel Feb 10 at 21:36\upmu, it seems like I have to enter math mode, which then ignores the text formatting (like bold), which doesn't seem ideal (especially for use withsiunitx, for example). – Tyler Feb 10 at 21:39