TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What PDF version and standard is ideally suited for the current version of pdflatex? Primarily for press, but online distribution will follow (large scientific publication).

Bonus: Include some of the pros-cons for requiring figures meet these standards?

Context: I am working with a design firm to reproduce a number of figures (mostly plots) which were originally submitted by contributing authors in bitmap form. I'm trying to determine what I should expect from them (as professionals).

share|improve this question

closed as unclear what you're asking by Joseph Wright Aug 8 '13 at 14:52

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

My pdflatex produces PDFv1.5, so anything <=1.5 is ok, and AFAIK, bitmap features are very stable between versions, so it should not make any difference. Or do I miss a point? – yo' Feb 22 '13 at 18:45
By standard, I was referring to things like PDF/x or PDF/a. – h0tw1r3 Feb 22 '13 at 19:12
IMO you're asking the wrong question. Pdflatex is very permissive about this, and it doesn't do anything to pdf figures besides copying them into the output. The issue is what PDFs will work with your RIP. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/33280/pdf-conformance-tool/… – Ben Crowell Feb 22 '13 at 20:33
This isn't really answerable: as noted above, pdfTeX really doesn't care about format. – Joseph Wright Aug 8 '13 at 14:53

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.