A high-level package from the LaTeX3 project that provides a powerful mechanism for defining new commands with various types of arguments.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

5
votes
0answers
75 views

What are best practices when augmenting and building on the keys provided by someone else's package

The situation is one where I'm developing my own commands and environments which build on the commands and environments provided by another package: for ease of talking let's call this other package ...
4
votes
0answers
55 views

xparse with underscore and optional argument

I need a macro which handles its input as follows: \foo A > #2 = A \foo{A} > #2 = A \foo(B) > #3 = A (round brackets) \foo_m A > #1 = m, #2 = A \foo_m{A} > #1 = m, #2 = A \foo_m(B) > #1 = m, #3 = B ...
2
votes
0answers
4 views

Collecting environment content with support for xparse arguments

I'm trying to create an environment which uses xparse style arguments but I have to be able to use the whole environment content in the environment definition, e.g. as an argument. Ideally I'd like ...
2
votes
0answers
30 views

Experimenting with l3box and l3skip's dim variables

Note: The following MWE has no significance in use or further application of any kind rather than just for experimenting with the packages explicitly written on the question title. ...
1
vote
0answers
63 views

frame in NewDocumentEnvironment

With beamer frames, this does not work. \newenvironment{itemframe}[1]{ \begin{frame}{#1} \begin{itemize} }{ \end{itemize} \end{frame} } Adding fragile, environment=itemframe as an ...
0
votes
0answers
16 views

Texstudio: Autocompletion of xparse commands

I have defined a new command using xparse, but the command doesn't show up in the autocomplete. Furthermore the definition of the command is in red: The command is working, but it just doesn't show ...