# Tag Info

29

I recommend you do the following: Get rid of all \left and \right directives since they (a) insert undesirable horizontal whitespace and (b) don't actually do anything useful in the present context. Use \substack (provided by the amsmath package) to break the line below \bigcup into two parts. Use \textup (or \textnormal) instead of the default math ...

19

You can use \mathclap from mathtools package: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[cmex10]{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} RA_U ( \mathit{new}, \mathit{ref} ) = \bigcup_{\mathclap{ \left\{ i \text{ such that } f_i (\mathit{ref}) < f_i ( \mathit{new} ) \right\} }} \left\{ X \in ...

19

This is an intelligent solution with systeme package. Just type each term blindly, the package will arrange them automatically. For example, if you type 3z+y=10 in the first row, the term will be aligned as shown in the output image. \documentclass[preview,border=12pt,varwidth]{standalone} \usepackage{systeme,mathtools} \begin{document} ...

15


10

Here is one suggestion using environments from amsmath: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation*} \left. \begin{alignedat}{4} x & {}+{} & y & & & = 1 \\ & & y & {}+{} & 2z & = 1 \\ x & & & {}+{} & z & = 0 ...

10

In \Crefrangeformat you have to refer to a valid counter, in your case equation and not eq. Also, you can insert "eqs." inside it not to have to specify it every time. Moreover, it is better to define \crefrangeformat and leave \Crefrangeformat undefined, so when you use \crefrange you get the non-capitalised version and when you use \Crefrange you get the ...

9

I could understand this only if the center column expressions are horizontally centered, but then the first two lines will become unreadable. Leave some more vertical space than the default between lines and center everything; you want a sequence of inequalities, each a consequence of the preceding line; the reader will understand this and follow without ...

9

Add the options remember picture and overlay to the connecting drawing commands: \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,trees,positioning} \author{Apurba Paul} \begin{document} ...

8

Is this what you're looking for? Note that I have added an extra column of & % arara: pdflatex % !arara: indent: {overwrite: yes} \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{alignat*}{2} ...

8

How about this? \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{array}{rcl} % First line \sum\limits_{i=0}^{h-1} k^i < & n & \leq \sum\limits_{i=0}^h k^i \\[1ex] % Second line \dfrac{k^h-1}{k-1} < & n & \leq \dfrac{k^{h+1}-1}{k-1} \\[2ex] % Third line ... 8 A regular align (from amsmath) will do here: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath}% http://ctan.org/pkg/amsmath \begin{document} \begin{subequations} \begin{align} \omega_c &= \sqrt{\omega_{0}^{2} - \mu^{2}}, & \mu &< \omega_{0}, &\text{Underdamped} \\ \omega_c &= \sqrt{\mu^{2} - \omega_{0}^{2}}, & \mu &> ... 7 Try something like \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} $$\begin{split} A ={} & B + C + D + E + F + \\ & G + H + I + \dots, \quad\text{while x is true}. \end{split}$$ \end{document} Output If you don't want the equation to be numbered use equation* instead of equation. As Svend ... 7 You can use the align environment if you want. Remove the * to get the numbered equation form. The following is MWE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{align*} A {}={} & B + C + D + E + F +\\ & G + H + I + \dotsb, \quad \text{whilexis true.} \end{align*} \end{document} Another flavor would be like: \[ ... 7 It's hard to believe, but the depth of the digit 0 is 0.12pt (at normal size) in the font used by newtxmath, while it's 0pt for the digit 1. This creates a bigger depth in the contents of the square root in the denominator, which is sufficient for the choice of a bigger square root symbol. The difference seems tiny, but in your case, due to the presence of ... 7 You need to delete \centerline. It is a plain TeX command whose use within a LaTeX document is not supported. For information, \show\centerline returns > \centerline=macro: #1->\@@line {\hss #1\hss }. Thus, in your current code, \centerline\text{met} causes \centerline to pick up \text as its argument (hence the fact that you get 'met' in italics). ... 7 Remember: it's always easier for people here to diagnose the problem if you post a minimal working example (MWE). Hardcoding is evil The beauty of cleveref is that it removes the need for hardcoding and it allows you to easily change cross-reference format at any stage. Imagine if you hardcoded Eqs everywhere in your input file, and then changed your mind ... 6 @karlkoeller and @Jubobs have already answered your question. @Jubobs is exactly right that you shouldn't be typing the "eqs." manually, but leaving cleveref to do that for you. (If you have exceptions in your document where you need the labels without the text, use \labelcref et al.) Also, you shouldn't be using \Cref<x> (note the capitalisation) ... 6 What about this solution? \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \noindent A \hfill Z \begin{flalign} a_{ijk} &= \frac {Pr(M_{I} =2 \& M_J=1 \& M_K =1 | I=i , J=j , K=k)}{Pr (M_I =1 \& M_J =1 \& M_K=1 | I=i , J=j)}&&\\\nonumber &= \frac {\mu_{ijk211}}{\mu_{ijk111}}&& \end{flalign} ... 6 The \ldots is defined as \mathinner which adds surrounding space. When used in this context the extra space after is removed. Inside \vdotswithin it is treated as {}\ldots{} which ensure that the surrounding spaces are preserved. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} \begin{alignat*}{6} 1 && ... 6 You have to enclose in a group, i.e. { }, the text: \bcbar[label={\theta=a^2$}]{0.2} The complete example: \documentclass[varwidth=true, border=2pt]{standalone} \usepackage{bchart} \begin{document} \begin{bchart}[max=0.3] \bcbar[label={$\theta=a^2}]{0.2} \end{bchart} \end{document} The result: 6 Inside different math environments, it is highly impossible to do that alignment. But in the same environment (align here) it is possible with some manual intervention. \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{report} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \noindent Some text follows \begin{enumerate} \item Form2n+1$sample points (also known as sigma ... 5 use $$\label{eqn: current} I_{FS} = \sum_{\substack{i}}*\frac{1}{2}*\frac{W}{L}*(V_{gs}-V_{th})^2*(1+\lambdaV_{ds})=\frac{1}{2}*k*(V_{gs}-V_{th})^2*(1+\lambda*V_{ds})*\sum_{\substack{i}}*\frac{W}{L}$$ without the$ ...$They are only for inline math mode, see http://mirror.ctan.org/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf 5 "Undefined control sequence" error messages are always followed by a line that ends with the problem control sequence. It is important to include that information in your question. I will guess that it is \lambdaV. You need to separate \lambda and V with a space or some non-letter character. All The other errors are because of the$s at the start and end. ...

5

Option 1 \documentclass[preview,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}% change it to your own document class \usepackage[a4paper,margin=2cm,landscape]{geometry}% edit it to meet your preference \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \abovedisplayskip=0pt\relax% don't use this line in your production \begin{split} ...

5

Don't use eqnarray. Use align* from amsmath. Further, dom(x) looks like an operater, hence you may put \DeclareMathOperator{\dom}{dom} in the preamble and use it as \dom(x). I have also used \bigl and bigr from amsmath to make [ and ] bigger. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \DeclareMathOperator{\dom}{dom} \begin{document} \begin{align*} ...

5

First off, loading the package palatino will give you the "Palatino" font only in text mode, but not in math mode. To get "Palatino" in both text and math mode, load a package such as mathpazo or -- assuming you have a fairly up-to-date TeX distribution -- the packages newpxtext and newpxmath. Second, you're getting small, i.e., inline-style, integral ...

5

Instead of using \left( and \right) to auto-size the outermost set of parentheses, you could use \biggl( and \biggr): (Aside: See the postings Why the control sequences \bigl, \biggl, \bigr or \biggr, as I can always use \big or \bigg? and Difference between \big[ and \bigl[ for a discussion of the differences between \Bigg( and \Biggl(.) I would ...

5


5

There are two alternatives I'd consider. The first is the well known mhchem package: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem} \begin{document} \ce{Na2SO4 ->[\ce{H2O}] Na+ + SO4^2-} A shortcut for the above:\par \ce{Na2SO4 ->C[H2O] Na+ + SO4^2-} \ce{( 2Na+{,}SO4^2- ) + (Ba^2+{,}2Cl- ) -> BaSO4 v + 2NaCl} \end{document} The ...

5

Here's a simple solution defining an environment, eqn, that gives roman numbering. If you want shared numbering % arara: pdflatex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \newenvironment{eqn}{% \refstepcounter{equation}\equation} {\tag{\roman{equation}}\endequation} \begin{document} $$y=mx+b$$ ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible