# Tag Info

0

One option is to use split \documentclass{report} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} \begin{enumerate} \item here some text $$\begin{split} a+b+c+v & = d+g+t+h+y+u+j+i+k+l+o+f\\ &\phantom{{}= d}+r+t+g+b+h+y+n+d+e+r+f \\ &\phantom{{}= d}+w+e+r+t+yh+y+n+d+e+r+f \end{split}$$ text\\ \item and so ...

1

I suggest reducing the font size to \small (locally) and replacing the brace with bullets, using the \mathllap command from mathtools to have right-alignment of the conditions: \documentclass[3p,times,12pt,draft,twocolumn]{elsarticle} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} {\small% \begin{align}\label{eqA} \mathrlap{ E_{ ⊥ ,\,\mathrm{diff}}=} \\ \notag ...

2

I think that inserting a line break at a multiplicative location is inferior to breaking the line at an additive (or subtractive) location. Moreover, I think that a cases environment is not particularly well suited for the formula at hand. I'd use a basic \left\{ ... \right. construct and provide an additional line break in each of the two subformulas in ...

5

You don't need flalign (I see it too often abused) nor cases, but aligned: \documentclass[3p,times,12pt,draft,twocolumn]{elsarticle} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} E_{\perp,\mathrm{diff}}= \left\{ \begin{aligned} E_{g,\mathrm{meas}} &\cdot(1.020-0.254\cdot k+0.0123\\ &\cdot\sin\gamma_S) \quad \text{for ...

1

Redefine/modify the cases environment \makeatletter \def\env@cases{% \let\@ifnextchar\new@ifnextchar \left\lbrace \def\arraystretch{1.2}% \array{@{}l@{\hspace{2pt}}l@{}} % adjust 2pt to suit your need } \makeatother Code \documentclass[3p,times,12pt,draft,twocolumn]{elsarticle} %\usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{mathtools} \makeatletter ...

3

Here is how I would do it: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \noindent Let \begin{align*} A &= \frac{P(y \mid \Theta_{t + 1})}{P(y \mid \Theta_{t})},\\ B &= \sum_{s \in S} P(s \mid y; \Theta_{t + 1}),\\ C &= \sum_{k = 1}^{T} (y_{k} - \phi_{1 \mid t + 1}(s_{k}))y_{k - 1},\\ D &= \sum_{k = 1}^{T} (\phi_{0 ...

4

If you really want to inflict such a monster formula to your readers, I see nothing else than splitting numerator and denominator: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \begin{document} \[ \theta_{0|t+1}\approx \frac{ \begin{multlined} (\beta+1)\frac{P(y|\Theta_{t+1})}{P(y|\Theta_{t})} \sum_{s \in ...

2


5

The Answer of Mico will definitly work, but will be very costly if you'll write a much longer piece of text (e.g. Master Thesis). Using a koma-script class with the option fleqn (flush left equation) will "align" all equations on the left side: \documentclass[fleqn]{scrartcl} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \section*{Polynomials} Do the following ...

5

Your objective may be achieved easily by placing the sectioning instructions and short paragraphs inside an \intertext wrapper. In the example below, there is now only one align environment that spans a \section* directive. Do note that some material can not be placed inside \intertext. To play it safe, one should probably provide the instruction ...

2

As the manual for IEEEtran explains, just add the label after \IEEEyesnumber: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath,IEEEtrantools} \begin{document} \begin{IEEEeqnarray}{CC} \IEEEyesnumber\label{eq:both} \IEEEyessubnumber* bla bla & blub blub \label{eq:sub1}\\ bla bla & bla bla \label{eq:sub2} \end{IEEEeqnarray} where the set of equations ...

4

The cuted package (from the sttools bundle) can temporarily leave two columns mode with its strip environment. An example with the equation entered in the second column: \documentclass[twocolumn]{ltxdoc} \usepackage{mathtools, cuted} \usepackage{lipsum, color} \begin{document} \lipsum[1-2] \lipsum[1] \textsf{\color{red}Equation entered here: } ...

6

I don't think you have a much better option than this. Btw, you seem to use q_A for two different things. \documentclass[twocolumn]{ltxdoc} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} $$\sum_{q_\mathrm{tot}=0}^{Q_A+Q_B-2}\sum_{q_A=0}^{q_\mathrm{tot}}{\textstyle\binom{Q_A-1}{q_A}\binom{Q_B-1}{q_B}}x^{q_\mathrm{tot}},$$ where ...

4

Resizebox should work. \documentclass[twocolumn]{ltxdoc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{graphics} \begin{document} \lipsum[1] ...

11

You are already using amssymb I hope. Why not look in to the amsmath manual (texdoc amsldoc from command prompt/line). It provides many environments for typing mathematics. For these two equations, you can use gather* (no number). \documentclass[11pt,openany]{book} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,showframe} %% showframe for demo only \begin{document} ...

Top 50 recent answers are included