# Tag Info

0

I came across this question while checking tables and environments that would span across pages. Although the question was asked quite a while ago, and it may or may not be useful for the OP, a few points were not mentioned. For example, You can use the command \setcolumnwidth{width,width}[col1,col2] in the paracol package. Furthermore, I don't see the ...

7

You can use code key provided by tcolorbox \documentclass{article} \usepackage[most]{tcolorbox} \usepackage{kantlipsum} \usepackage{setspace} \doublespacing \begin{document} \kant[1] \noindent \begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,boxsep=3pt,code={\singlespacing}] \kant[2] \end{tcolorbox} \kant[3] \end{document} Regarding comment, the following works ...

4

\documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{siunitx} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{align*} \parbox{5cm}{\centering Concentration of unknown sample solution} &= \frac{303 - 0.00227}{0.215} \\[\jot] &= \SI{1.400}{\mg \per \L} \end{align*} \end{document}

1

With bigfoot 2.0 and the extended main text (and required additional page dimension) from the accepted answer but otherwise the document from the question, I get:

0

as @cfr provided a simple answer, however, my MWE involving sort of advanced code, i've just added the \setstretch{1.0} inside \@makefntext[1]: \renewcommand\@makefntext[1]{% \setstretch{1.0} \iftoggle{brkText} {\normalfont[\@thefnmark]\enspace #1} {\mkbibsuperscript{\normalfont\@thefnmark}\enspace #1}% \global\togglefalse{brkText}}

3

By default, footnotes, like body text, are single-spaced: My guess is that your code looks something like this: \documentclass{article} \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5} \usepackage{kantlipsum} \begin{document} \kant[1-2] This is some text\footnote{Here is a footnote which goes on and on and on and on some more until it takes more than the rest ...

1

Here's a solution that (a) uses a gather environment to collect the three equations, (b) uses \phantom{-} at the start of the first equation to help achieve a natural alignment of the first and second rows, (c) doesn't split the third equation across two lines, and (d) uses \smash[t]{...} on the fractional term at the start of the third equation to achieve ...

1

Rather strange usage of align, but the result similar to the original one. Additional decreasing may be obtained by an optional parameter of \\, e.g. \\[-1pt], but I do not reccomend it in this case. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} Original \label{20} P_{\ell}^k\geq -P_\ell^{\max}\cdot Z_\ell^k~~\forall ...

Top 50 recent answers are included