Tag Info

New answers tagged


I came across this question while checking tables and environments that would span across pages. Although the question was asked quite a while ago, and it may or may not be useful for the OP, a few points were not mentioned. For example, You can use the command \setcolumnwidth{width,width}[col1,col2] in the paracol package. Furthermore, I don't see the ...


You can use code key provided by tcolorbox \documentclass{article} \usepackage[most]{tcolorbox} \usepackage{kantlipsum} \usepackage{setspace} \doublespacing \begin{document} \kant[1] \noindent \begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced,boxsep=3pt,code={\singlespacing}] \kant[2] \end{tcolorbox} \kant[3] \end{document} Regarding comment, the following works ...


\documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{siunitx} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{align*} \parbox{5cm}{\centering Concentration of unknown sample solution} &= \frac{303 - 0.00227}{0.215} \\[\jot] &= \SI{1.400}{\mg \per \L} \end{align*} \end{document}


With bigfoot 2.0 and the extended main text (and required additional page dimension) from the accepted answer but otherwise the document from the question, I get:


as @cfr provided a simple answer, however, my MWE involving sort of advanced code, i've just added the \setstretch{1.0} inside \@makefntext[1]: \renewcommand\@makefntext[1]{% \setstretch{1.0} \iftoggle{brkText} {\normalfont[\@thefnmark]\enspace #1} {\mkbibsuperscript{\normalfont\@thefnmark}\enspace #1}% \global\togglefalse{brkText}}


By default, footnotes, like body text, are single-spaced: My guess is that your code looks something like this: \documentclass{article} \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5} \usepackage{kantlipsum} \begin{document} \kant[1-2] This is some text\footnote{Here is a footnote which goes on and on and on and on some more until it takes more than the rest ...


Here's a solution that (a) uses a gather environment to collect the three equations, (b) uses \phantom{-} at the start of the first equation to help achieve a natural alignment of the first and second rows, (c) doesn't split the third equation across two lines, and (d) uses \smash[t]{...} on the fractional term at the start of the third equation to achieve ...


Rather strange usage of align, but the result similar to the original one. Additional decreasing may be obtained by an optional parameter of \\, e.g. \\[-1pt], but I do not reccomend it in this case. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} Original \begin{equation}\label{20} P_{\ell}^k\geq -P_\ell^{\max}\cdot Z_\ell^k~~\forall ...

Top 50 recent answers are included