Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

9

There is a bunch of options to improve this: Put T(n) in math mode --> spacing before = is better Use \left(....\right) to get bigger bracket, however the spacing before and after brackets are too large Use \biggl(...\biggr) for larger brackets and better spacing Use \mleft( and \mright) from the mleftright package for adapted brackets and better spacing ...


8

Such a big formula should be in a displayed formula, see later for reasons. Use equation or equation* (the latter if you don't want an equation number). I also changed a bit your preamble, with instructions to geometry rather than setting internal parameter such as \topmargin or \evensidemargin: you seem to want one inch margins and \geometry{margin=1in} ...


6

It's easy with newunicodechar \documentclass{article} \usepackage[intlimits]{amsmath} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{unicode-math} \removelimits{\int} \else \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \fi \usepackage{newunicodechar} \newunicodechar{√}{\sqrt} \ifxetex\else % these are already available with unicode-math ...


5

I think you have two options: Insert one or more judiciously chosen \allowbreak directives inside the inline math equation to allow line breaks after one of the commas, or Convert the inline equation to a displayed equation, as (i) the equation may be sufficiently important to merit this treatment and (ii) you're dealing with fairly narrow columns. ...


5

It's much easier to debug code with a working minimal example rather than a code fragment. The problem with your code is that you have a \right} that isn't matched and doesn't seem to do anything. The label for an underbrace is added with _X after the \underbrace argument. Here is a fixed example. I've also replaced \Bbb with \mathbb as the former command ...


5

This is an all-in-one solution using tasks. Time to use modern packages. I have defined two environments for clarity. \documentclass[12pt, a4paper]{scrartcl} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,stmaryrd} %\usepackage[inline]{enumitem} %\usepackage{enumerate} %\usepackage{tabto} %\usepackage{paralist} \usepackage[more]{tasks} ...


4

Don't use \epsilon for "element of"; instead, use the \in macro. You need to place curly braces around the material that's to be placed in the exponent positions. Don't switch in and out of math mode in one and the same equation. \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $A(n) \in \Theta(n^{\log_b a}) = \Theta(n^{\log_2 2} ) = \Theta(n)$ \end{document}


4

\limits can be used after \sum to put the bounds below and above instead to the side: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{gather} \hat{r}_{ui} = \bar r + \sigma_u \cdot \frac{ \sum_{v \in N_i(u)} w_{uv} (r_{vi} - \bar{r}_v) / \sigma_v }{ \sum_{v \in N_i(u)} |w_{uv}| } \\ \hat{r}_{ui} = ...


4

Apart from the wrong dots, it seems an align*: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \usepackage{lipsum} \begin{document} \lipsum*[2] \begin{align*} \{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\lnot\lnot\phi\},\dots,B_i\}\quad & \rightsquigarrow \quad \{B_1,\dots,B\cup\{\phi\},\dots,B_i\} \\ ...


4

You are already using package amsmath and have therefore \tfrac, which puts the fraction in the math style \textstyle: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{a4paper, total={14.5cm, 23cm}} \newcommand*{\diff}{\mathop{}\!d} \begin{document} The amplitude $u_2 (x_2, y_2)$ at the back focal ...


4

Use \DeclareMathOperator{operatorcommandname}{operator name} in the preamble for function or operator names that should be printed upright. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \DeclareMathOperator{\sinc}{sinc} \DeclareMathOperator{\si}{si} \begin{document} \begin{align} \si(x) &= \dfrac{\sin(x)}{x} \\ \sinc(x) &= \si(\pi x) ...


4

You can underline the whole equation or colour it..... using tcolorbox. \documentclass[14pt,a4paper,headlines=6,headinclude=true]{scrartcl} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,stmaryrd} \usepackage{empheq} \usepackage[theorems,skins]{tcolorbox} \newtcbox{\underlined}[1][]{nobeforeafter,math upper,tcbox raise base, enhanced ...


3

You can't use \left and \right across& which limits the scope. Also, it is not a good idea to use \left and \right, use \big brothers family from amsmath. These need not be balanced. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation} \begin{split} \left\{\right.&(a,b) \mid \\ &\left. a \in A, b \in B\right\} ...


3

LaTeX can be hard to get started with. I can't comment on assistive technology, but — if a good LaTeX editor with syntax hilighting (or a WYS IWYG editor) will do — then I can give suggestions for how to get better output, and to write it more easily. Here are a few pointers which might help you to speed up your workflow, or at least get more ...


3

Use a tabular \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath,array} \begin{document} \begin{tabular}{>{$}r<{$}@{\,}>{$=}l<{$}} x + 2 & 3 \\ -2 & -2 \\ \hline x & 1 \end{tabular} \end{document}


3

Here's a solution that uses an array environment and takes care to preserve the appropriate amounts of spacing around operators of type mathbin ("+" and "-") and mathrel ("="). It also uses the macro \midrule (from the booktabs package) to get nice spacing around the horizontal line. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{array,amsmath,booktabs} ...


3

What about this? I added some vertical spacing at the beginning of inparaenum, with the etoolbox package. Don't forget a blank line: \documentclass[15pt, a4paper]{scrartcl} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,stmaryrd} %\usepackage[shortlabels, inline]{enumitem}%usepackage{enumerate} \usepackage{tabto} \usepackage{paralist} \usepackage{setspace} ...


2

Have a look at http://ctan.sharelatex.com/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/physics/physics.pdf 2.5 Derivatives I use it and i am very happy with this package. EDIT: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{physics} \usepackage{amssymb} \begin{document} \begin{align} \left(\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} \dd{x} \right)^2 ...


2

An example with tcolorbox \documentclass{article} \usepackage[most]{tcolorbox} \usepackage{amsmath, amssymb} \begin{document} \begin{tcolorbox} \[ \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \\[0.3em]\end{bmatrix}.* \begin{bmatrix} 4 \\[0.3em] 2 \\[0.3em] 1 \\[0.3em] \end{bmatrix} =\text{ERROR} \] \[\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\[0.3em] 2 \\[0.3em] 3 \\[0.3em] ...


2

Use align, not gather: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \newcommand{\suchthat}{\mid} \begin{document} \begin{subequations} \label{eq:omegai} % \begin{align} \label{eq:omega0} \Omega_0 ={}& \{(\omega_{12},\omega_{23}) \suchthat \hat{\omega}_{12} > \omega_t,\ \hat{\omega}_{23} > \omega_t,\ \hat{\omega}_{31} > \omega_t \} \\ % ...


2

You can use a regular array: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}% Just for this example \usepackage[nopar]{lipsum}% Just for this example \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \begin{document} \lipsum[1] \[ \begin{array}{r@{\quad\rightsquigarrow\quad}l} \{ B_1, \dots, B \cup \{ \neg\neg\phi \}, \dots, B_i \} & \{ B_1, \dots, ...


2

The symbols provided by MnSymbol are not set up for use with unicode-math. Some are missing, some are not scalable in size. These need to be replaced by a different math font. For my opinion XITS Math does a good job. One just needs to find the unicode characters due to fix. Partial differential \partial: \setmathfont[range={"2202} ]{XITS Math} The ...


2

Is this what you want? After a lot of phantoms, looks right. \begin{align*} \mathcal{H} (c, K, \lambda, t) &= \frac{c^{1-\frac{1}{\sigma} } -1}{1 - \frac{1}{\sigma}} + \lambda \cdot \left( r \cdot K + w \cdot L_Y + \Pi_x \cdot A - c \cdot L \right) \\ \rlap{% \underline{% \vphantom{$\displaystyle\frac{\dot c}{c}$}% \hphantom{$\Leftrightarrow ...


2

Here are unicode math macros I think I'll try to use: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{unicode-math} \setmathfont{Asana Math} \usepackage{newunicodechar} % roots: \newunicodechar{√}{\sqrt} \newunicodechar{∛}{\sqrt[3]} \newunicodechar{∜}{\sqrt[4]} % full differential: \newunicodechar{d}{\,\mathrm{d}} % superscripts: ...


2

The \mathpunct{} (without : inside {}) is the definition of \colon. Link1 Both : and \colon typeset a colon, but \colon is a punctuation symbol, while : is considered as a relation symbol as regards to spacing. Link2


1

Going with simplicity, and the most common use case for the win I'm copying my edits here as the answer. According to How can LaTeX code in a data file be read by pgfplotstable? it is impossible to insert expandable material in headers to be formatted by pgfplotstable. Therefore, as in percusse comment use column name key to access and format any column ...


1

As a follow up to @Werner's excellent explanation, as I was using R I created a sanitise function to use instead of the default xtable::sanitize function that escapes these appropriately. The package optiRum can be downloaded for the sanitise function to be used.



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible