# Tag Info

4

So given that David has told you why it is that way, there are several things you can do with that information. You can create your own macro \tunderbrace that is just like \underbrace but in text style, by altering the existing definition. Or you, just for fun, create your own version, \Tunderbrace, using stacks: \documentclass{article} ...

7

underbrace is defined in the latex format as \def\underbrace#1{\mathop{\vtop{\m@th\ialign{##\crcr $\hfil\displaystyle{#1}\hfil$\crcr %%%%%%%%%%%% \noalign{\kern3\p@\nointerlineskip}% \upbracefill\crcr\noalign{\kern3\p@}}}}\limits} There is a (not unreasonable:-) assumption that no one would want textstyle here. So if you really do want ...

1


2

The Problem lies within the definition of \textsuperscript that uses math mode. \DeclareRobustCommand*\textsuperscript[1]{% \@textsuperscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\@textsuperscript#1{% {\m@th\ensuremath{^{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} A possible workaround is redefining the actual command so that it will not get in the way with your equations, this ...

2

_ is a special character that denotes the beginning of a subscript, and that is only allowed in math-mode. As such, inserting around the math-related content, the problem is avoided. The equation environment automatically initiates math-mode, so there's no additional need to enter math-mode. If you actually want an underscore, then you can use any of the ... 3 Here's an alternative. It provides left-alignment of the super/subscripts. EDIT: In an effort to answer the OP's question, "Is there a way to get it so that the limits are left aligned with the horizontal midpoint of the close paren in automatic fashion?" The answer is yes. Here it is: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[usestackEOL]{stackengine} ... 7 Like the following? \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage{mathtools,amsthm} \usepackage{amsfonts} \begin{document}(x_j\mkern-10.5mu\mathop{)}\limits_{j=1}^\infty(x_j)\mkern-10.5mu\mathop{\vphantom{)}}\limits_{j=1}^\infty\mathop{(x_j)}\limits_{j=1}^{\infty}(x_j)_{j=1}^\infty$\end{document} 4 Using a stack inset, the code is straightforward. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{stackengine} \def\dcirc#1{\stackinset{c}{}{t}{-3.5pt}% {$\mkern2.5mu\scriptscriptstyle\circ\mkern-2mu\circ$}{$#1$}} \begin{document}$\dcirc{X}= A\dcirc{x}$\end{document} 14 A modification of the \dddot macro of amsmath: \documentclass{article} \newcommand\ringring[1]{% {% make an Ord atom \mathop{\kern0pt #1}\limits^{% set a box over the variable \vbox to-1.85ex{ \kern-2ex % lower the ring accents \hbox to 0pt{\hss\normalfont\kern.1em \r{}\kern-.45em \r{}\hss}% \vss % fill }% end of \vbox ... 5 With the accentspackage, it' as simple as \mathring{\mathring{…}}: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{lmodern} \usepackage{accents} \begin{document}$\mathring{\mathring{A}}$\end{document} 1 Another option is to use bbold package. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{bbold} \begin{document} $\mathbb{1}$ \end{document} 2 Here's the fishing rod, instead of the fish itself:Detexify! Just tried it and it returned \preceq as the first result. It is probably a good chance to mention that a mobile version (android and iOS) is available as well. 3 You also have curly versions and their negative versions in mathabx: in mdsymbol: and in Mnsymbol: 5 The line in that linked Unicode map shows: -precedesequal 8826 T \predeq See PrecedesEqual on wolfram.com: You can find that symbol in the Comprehensive Symbol List, for example in the binary relations table as \preceq: 2 I guess you are looking for a way to number your equations "within" sections, that is, add the section number before the equation number. This can be done automatically if you add the line \numberwithin{equation}{section} in your preamble, without any manual intervention. MWE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} ... 0 I think the simplest (least complicated) solution is to use \phantom, as follows: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}\begin{array}{c} \phantom{\times99}384\\ \underline{\times\phantom{999}56}\\ \phantom{\times9}2304\\ \underline{\phantom\times1920\phantom9}\\ \phantom\times21504 \end{array}\end{equation*} ... 9 You could define a command to handle this: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{array} \makeatletter \def\ae@arithmetic{\@ifnextchar[%] {\@ae@arithmetic} {\@ae@arithmetic[+]}} \def\@ae@arithmetic[#1]#2#3{%% \def\ae@tmp{*}%% \def\ae@tmp@mult{x}%% \def\ae@operation{#1}%% \ifx\ae@tmp@mult\ae@operation\def\ae@operation{*}\fi ... 2 One approach would be to have the addition sign on the right (which I have seen on occasions), and would look something like this: \documentclass[]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,tabu} \begin{document} \begin{equation*} \begin{tabular}{r@{\;}l@{}} 356 \\ 42 & +\\ \hline 398 \end{tabular} \end{equation*} \end{document} gives: The code is a bit ... 0 THis worked for me Thank you \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \tag{3.1} \begin{split} \log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \tag{3.1}\label{eq:3.1} \end{split} ... 4 You can use \tag: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} $$\log \mu_{ijk}= \lambda + \lambda_i ^I + \lambda_j ^J+\lambda_k ^K+\lambda_{ij} ^{IJ}+\lambda_{ik} ^{IK}+\lambda_{jk} ^{JK}+\lambda_{ijk} ^{IJK} \tag{3.1}\label{eq:3.1}$$ \end{document} 8 egreg is right, of course. The statement should be$\beta = -0.84$,$t = -0.209$,$P = 0.04$\beta is a math character and will need some math environment to be displayed. That could be inline math mode, using$...$or some equation environment. You would also like the spacing to be correct between the numbers and the mathematical symbols, thus wrapping ... -1 Try protect'ing the section, as in \section\protect{This title contains mathematics such as$\beta_i$} 2 I wouldn't count it as a miktex bug if two packages uses the same file name and imho the package maintainer should sort this out and not the tex distribuations. When such name clashes in the same branch of a texmf tree exists the search result is not predictable -- it can e.g. depend on the installation order, date or whatever. So you have imho the ... 4 In revision 4975 of TeX Live (2007-09-18) we find the annotation omit ubbold.fd from jknapltx, clash with Ubbold.fd + sauter bbold disfunctional? (Zdenek Wagner, 9 Aug 2007 16:20:21 +0200) So my suggestion is to remove the file ubbold.fd from your system and file a bug report to MiKTeX's maintainer. 3 Here's what happens. A section title is a moving argument, which means it's stored in memory and written out in the .aux file when the next page shipout occurs. When the write operation is performed, TeX expands macros without executing commands; moreover it is not in math mode at the time (it is in no mode, actually). This means that the conditional is ... 2 \documentclass[12pt,twocolumn,headings=normal]{article} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage{amsmath} %\DeclareMathSizes{12}{1}{1}{1} \begin{document} this is the problem equation.. If$n \geq 2$then \begin{multline*} P^{bb}_{g}(n,p)=*P^{bb}_{g}(n-1,p)+{}\\ (1-p)^2+p*(1-p) *P^{bb}_{g}(n-2,p) \end{multline*} Otherwise$P^{bb}_{g}(n,p)=0$i have many like ... 3 One possible solution. Code \documentclass[12pt,twocolumn,headings=normal]{article} \usepackage{fullpage} \usepackage{amsmath} %\DeclareMathSizes{12}{1}{1}{1} \begin{document} \begin{equation*} P^{bb}_{g}(n,p)=\begin{cases} 0, & \text{if$n=0~\&~1$}.\\ p*P^{bb}_{g}(n-1,p) +(1-p)^2 &\\ {}+p*(1-p) *P^{bb}_{g}(n-2,p) , & \text{if$n \geq ...

6

this looks to me a lot like unicode U+223B (homothetic); there's also U+2A6B (tilde operator with rising dots). these would be in the stix or xits fonts. Speravir confirms the identify of U+2238 and also points out in a comment that it is included in other opentype and truetype fonts (see below for his edit). it's not found either in the comprehensive ...

9


12

Let's look at the definition of \, in the kernel: % latex.ltx, line 1304: \DeclareRobustCommand{\,}{% \relax\ifmmode\mskip\thinmuskip\else\thinspace\fi } Now we look at \thinspace: % latex.ltx, line 1315: \def\thinspace{\kern .16667em } So in text mode a kern is used; a kern is almost like glue, but is never used as a line break point unless it's ...

10

The LaTeX approach is that all commands should share, as far as possible, a similar input syntax. In the case of the \hskip and similar primitives, the syntax is not 'LaTeX-like': they pick up a following number without braces in a way that is not predictable from the 'usual LaTeX rules'. At the same time, and as you observe, the primitive syntax allows an ...

3

Everything is already said in the comments. tabular puts every cell in text mode, and array does the same, but in math mode. So, in your case, \begin{equation*} \begin{array}{c|c|c} P & Q & P \oplus Q \\ \hline \text{T} & \text{T} & \text{F} \\ \text{T} & \text{F} & \text{T} \\ \text{F} & \text{T} & ...

2

The problem occurs because of a conflict between classicthesis and the fourier package, which is loaded because you've set Utopia as the Roman font. Set the Roman font to Default in Document --> Settings --> Fonts, and things should work fine.

4

Another option is to use bold letters for vectors. I have also changed the backets to parenthesis, hoping that won't change the meaning in your subject. physics package is used for making vectors bold with \vb* macro. If you want upright letters for vectors, use \vb without star. Since \cross is defined by defined by physcis, I have changed it to \Cross. ...

8

The square brackets seem to be needlessly tall. Specifically, I don't think it's necessary to make the square brackets sufficiently tall to have them enclose the arrows. Nobody should be confused by the arrows "sticking out" above the brackets. Hence, using \big instead of \bigg for the size of the brackets should be fine. Where I also see room for ...

2

One must be careful when disregarding the math axis, but it seems from your question that you are unhappy with the extra space below the vectors, about which the braces enclose. That extra space is there to give symmetry to the over-arrow vector notation. Many would say that should not be disturbed, even if it looks odd. However, since you were looking ...

3

One possible solution (since you haven't told us how you would like it to be): \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{fourier} \DeclarePairedDelimiter{\abs}{\lvert}{\rvert} \newcommand*\cross[2]{\left[\overrightarrow{#1},\overrightarrow{#2}\right]} \begin{document} \cos \varphi = \frac{\cross{CA'}{CB} \cdot ...

1

With OTF's, one way is to define them with \Umathcharnumdef\Alpha="0391 \Umathcharnumdef\Beta="0392 % ... \Umathcharnumdef\Omega="03A9

2

If you want that the Greek letters respect the current family you have to completely redefine the math fonts, probably using Latin Modern Math. A better way to define them as “fixed” symbols is as follows: \font\tenrm="[lmroman10-regular.otf]:mapping=tex-text" \textfont0=\tenrm \font\greekcapstenrm=cmr10 \font\greekcapssevenrm=cmr7 ...

Top 50 recent answers are included