Tag Info

New answers tagged math-mode

0

There might exist different notations for the hypergeometric function. Here is a small example, using , as separators, but I would rather use ;. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{mleftright} % for better spacings \begin{document} \section{First} \begin{align*} H\mleft(k\vert N,M,n\mright) &= \\ \intertext{or} &\\ ...

2

Please do not use $$\dots$$ but $\dots$ unless you are using plain TeX. For your question. Just use \dfrac{}{} (display style fraction) from amsmath. % arara: pdflatex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} % loads amsmath \begin{document} \begin{enumerate} \setcounter{enumi}{10} \item \begin{enumerate} \item $8!$ ...

2

From a Physicist's view I suggest both the usage of esvect (font) package and \dot instead of primes, since the relevant equation contains a time derivative. The esvect provides distinctive vector arrows, the relevant command is \vv instead of \vec, however. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{esvect} ...

5


0

Here's a solution that maintains your basic array setup, while simplifying it somewhat. Inside the equation, it first defines two scratch macros, \blocka and \blockb, and then uses each of them twice: first to typeset the material itself, then as the argument of the \vphantom instructions. Each "block" macro consists of an array environment that contains two ...

3

You can add \displaystyle to the columns you like in your array: % arara: pdflatex \documentclass[a4paper]{book} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{array} \begin{document} \lipsum[1] \begin{aligned} &\left.\begin{array}{r@{\;}>{{}\displaystyle}l} U =& \sum_{\mathclap{\text{bonds},\,i}} ...

1

Here's a general option which addresses your concern. That is, a localized change from inline to display style mathematical typesetting. The easier option for the case you're using array is adjusting the argument thereof (as mentioned in the comments). The solution opens a group, and redefines the macros you wish to be \displaystyle. After the group closes ...

7

With amsmath there is the aligned environment you can use inside other building blocks; it inserts a tiny space before it which may be undone with \!. If you use the combination of split inside equation instead one align, then only one equation number is attached and you avoid writing \notag many times. By default the number is centered, but the tbtags ...

3

You can use the \phantom command \documentclass{article} \usepackage{multicol,amsmath,amssymb,geometry} \begin{document} \begin{multicols}{2} \begin{align} P(&\mathcal{X},\mathcal{C},\xi|\alpha,\beta,\theta^0) \notag\\ &= \prod_d P(\mathcal{X}_d|\beta)P(\mathcal{C}_d|\alpha,\xi) \prod_c P(\xi^c|\theta^0) \notag\\ &\propto\prod_d \beta^d_c ...

Top 50 recent answers are included