Hot answers tagged

2

I've never heard of a super option. But if you dig into the chem-rsc.cbx code, you'll find these lines: \RequireCitationStyle{numeric-comp} \ExecuteBibliographyOptions { autocite = superscript, autopunct = true , sorting = none } So using \autocite instead of \cite should do the trick.


2

In your code you have several problems, some related to KOMA-Script (class scrartcl), some with your bibliography. Let's start with KOMA-Script: Your line \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Literatur} can you delete, use better the KOMA-Script class option bibliography=totoc, instead. Change the class options to the way they are used in KOMA-Script. See the ...


2

The ISO 690 Wikipedia page claims that this standard concerns the required elements, or inputs, of a bibliographic reference, and that it is not concerned with the formatting of the typeset output. If this information is correct, it doesn't make much sense to talk about an ISO690-compliant BibTeX or biblatex style: Just about all BibTeX and biblatex styles ...


2

Not a direct answer but rather a pointer to a possible route to a solution. Last year I developed a BibTeX style for a book catalogue bookdb.bst which involved extending one of the regular BibTeX files. Run texdoc bookdb to view the User Manual and possibly read bookdb.bst if you want the gory internal details. The User Manual doesn't describe the internal ...


1

Probably you would need to adjust the style of the bibliography according to your desiderata, but here's a basic schema. The entries are classified using entrysubtype in the .bib and subtype is then used to filter the entries when printing the bibliography. natbib=true is a compatibility option. nobib tells the class not to actually load natbib. ...


1

The formatting of the names used in the citation call-outs is governed not by the natbib package but by the bibliography style that's in use. I'm assuming that you'll want to show the first names of all authors, rather than just those of of selected authors. While you're at it, I'll also assume that you'd want to show any "junior" name components, if ...


1

The bibliography style plain can only generate numeric-style citation call-outs. Since you're using the natbib citation management package, you should (a) use the plainnat bibliography style, which can produce both numeric-style and authoryear-style citation call-outs, and (b) provide the option authoryear when loading the natbib package: ...


1

The class bioinfo loads natbib without any options, thus the default format for citation is numeric. An option is to modify how natbib is loaded by the class. Thus one can make a copy of the class file (let us say call my-bioinfo.cls and then edit line 827. The new line 827 should be \RequirePackage[numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}


1

I contacted the maintainer of the natbib package. For completeness, I'm posting the response that I was given. This is an issue that cannot be easily solved. The whole \citet with superscripted numerals was a complicated programming problem, since it is radically different from regular numerical citations. The problem was to add the authors to the ...


1

This style already uses the sorting function. You can edit sort function bib.sort.order in your .bst file. It is very good described on Bibtex .bst file modification to include alphabetical ordering. I hope it will help you.


1

It seems to work if you add this before the \nobibliography this here: \makeatletter \renewcommand\BR@b@bibitem[2][]{\BR@bibitem[#1]{#2}\BR@c@bibitem{#2}} \makeatother


1

Well, in your code I can see some problems. For example should package hyperref be the last called package! The documentation of package natbib can you read by typing texdoc natbib on your console/terminal. There are the styles listed you can use with natbib and which styles and field names are supported. To give you a starting point I changed your ...


1

TeX Live (including MacTeX) uses several distinct hierarchies of files ('texmf trees'). The contents of the trees is managed and searched differently. Although this can be customised differently, the chances are that you are using the default. In that case, the main 3 trees you have to think about will be the following. The main distribution tree ...


1

Given that the style you need to use disallows using natbib, the conclusion is that the organization you'll submit your paper to doesn't accept an author-year citation scheme. Most likely also biblatex would be rejected. Emulating the working of natbib would mean rewriting it from scratch.



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible