# Tag Info

2

I am a step further towards my desired outcome. I integrated @JLDiaz approach into org-mode by using a LaTeX code block that makes use of the dot2texipackage. While the forestapproach proposed by @Ignasi is very human readable, the dot2texin my view isn't. Therefore, I created a small lisp function that translates my pseudo code (see above in the question) ...

5

As suggested in a comment, a possible approach would be dot and dot2tex. Dot's syntax is very terse. This particular example comes out a bit convoluted, due to the long text in some nodes, but it is nevertheless rather readable: digraph G { node [shape=box, fixedsize=true, width=1.2]; shares [label="*\\\\Shares"]; shares -> "common shares" [label=...

5

You can try with forest, I think is quite human readable, ... once you are used to it. \documentclass[border=2mm]{standalone} \usepackage{forest} \begin{document} \begin{forest} box/.style={rounded corners, draw, fill=gray!20} [* Shares, box [encompass [common shares, box [carry [voting rights, box ...

Top 50 recent answers are included