Tag Info

New answers tagged

10

There have been some changes in unicode-math, for fixing some issues in multiletter identifiers using \mathXY commands. Now, a single bold math symbol should be built with \symbf rather than \mathbf, which is reserved for multiletter things. \documentclass{article} % Load fontspec and define a document font: \usepackage{fontspec} \setmainfont{TeX Gyre ...


1

The following example with up-to-date TeXLive works well: \documentclass{amsart} \usepackage{colonequals} \usepackage[math-style=ISO]{unicode-math} \setmainfont[Numbers=OldStyle]{Minion Pro} \setmathfont{MinionMath-Regular} \setmathfont[range={\mathfrak,\mathcal}]{XITS Math} \begin{document} foo \textit{bar} \textbf{baz} \begin{equation*} f(x) ...


1

It seems that the backing up done by \arrowfill@ is insufficient when Latin Modern Math is used. Here's a fix: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{ifxetex} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{etoolbox} \ifxetex \usepackage{unicode-math} \makeatletter \patchcmd{\arrowfill@}{-7mu}{-14mu}{}{} \patchcmd{\arrowfill@}{-7mu}{-14mu}{}{} ...


0

It's got something to do with how \: is interpreted. The following code doesn't have the same problem. \documentclass{article} \RequirePackage{amsmath} \usepackage{unicode-math} \begin{document} \begin{equation} \xrightarrow[\; \varepsilon \to 0 \;]{} \end{equation} \end{document}



Top 50 recent answers are included