meta user
network profile
| bio | website | s.mcateer.id.au |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | May 14 at 19:01 | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
|
May 12 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Feb 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Sep 30 |
accepted | Conflict between amsmath and ntheorem, or, how I fell into an infinite troubleshooting loop |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
Conflict between amsmath and ntheorem, or, how I fell into an infinite troubleshooting loop I confirm the workaround and appreciate the confirmation. I might try to submit a bug report. |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
Conflict between amsmath and ntheorem, or, how I fell into an infinite troubleshooting loop That code produces the theoremmark overlapping the equation number and the cross-refernce does not work. |
|
Sep 23 |
asked | Conflict between amsmath and ntheorem, or, how I fell into an infinite troubleshooting loop |
|
Mar 14 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Mar 14 |
accepted | bbm package error |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error Then it must be just me. Thanks for the help. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error And this is an install from the TUG website (as opposed to some repo)? (I mean this one). |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error It would be nice if somebody with a manual install of TeXlive 2011 can confirm that the bbm package installs fine for them. Then it must be just me. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error It could well be just me, see comment above. Again it is a manual install of TL2011 from the TUG website, not from the Fedora repos. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error See my comment above. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
bbm package error I got this working by downloading the archive here and manually unpacking it into /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bbm then running tlmgr update --all. |
|
Mar 14 |
asked | bbm package error |
|
Mar 12 |
awarded | Student |
|
Feb 17 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Feb 16 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Feb 16 |
comment |
What's the proper way to write a vector with a single character subscript? I think it should be consistent regardless of how many indexes there are and in the case in which you have many, the marks being over the symbol only would be the only way to go. But in this particular case, it should just come down to taste. |
|
Jan 9 |
comment |
Syntax doldrums I'm flabbergasted. At best I was hoping for something like "yeah, that'd be nice but it's not going to happen". I was expecting "go away, the syntax is great". An actual implementation ... jaw dropping. Thank you. |
