| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 8 months |
| seen | May 16 at 19:19 | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
|
Jul 14 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jul 14 |
accepted | Typesetting 144…4 with “n times” under the 4's is easy, but what about \sqrt{144…4}? |
|
Jul 14 |
comment |
Typesetting 144…4 with “n times” under the 4's is easy, but what about \sqrt{144…4}? Yep. And it looks like someone has used \smash on the post that inspired this question too. |
|
Jul 14 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jul 14 |
asked | Typesetting 144…4 with “n times” under the 4's is easy, but what about \sqrt{144…4}? |
|
Jul 4 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Jan 7 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Nov 2 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Sep 2 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Sep 2 |
revised |
natbib and hyperref for (Author, Year) style produces two links added minimal example as I'm facing the same problem |
|
Sep 2 |
suggested | suggested edit on natbib and hyperref for (Author, Year) style produces two links |
|
Jul 25 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul 10 |
comment |
Programmatically setting a counter to a substring Thanks! This is the solution I ended up using -- it "feels nicer" to be able to use a substring macro. |
|
Jul 10 |
accepted | Programmatically setting a counter to a substring |
|
Jul 7 |
asked | Programmatically setting a counter to a substring |
|
Dec 31 |
comment |
Do semantics matter in LaTeX? If not, why not? I'd say one should be more willing to tolerate "unsemantic" markup in TeX than in HTML, because with HTML, the markup is all there is, but with TeX, the markup is only a means to producing the final output: a rendered document that has no trace of any semantics beyond the presentational. (That said, if you find yourself contorting tables and lists all the time to get what you want, you should probably be defining your own newcommands for those things.) |
|
Nov 29 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
Turn on subsection numbering in memoir Thanks! I had tried setting that in the preamble, but it hadn't worked -- it turned out that \mainmatter resets secnumdepth. Now that I know what to look for, the memoir documentation states that calling \maxsecnumdepth in the preamble sets the numbering level for \mainmatter. |
|
Sep 21 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Sep 21 |
accepted | Turn on subsection numbering in memoir |