2,691 reputation
418
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 7 months
seen 6 mins ago

Sep
11
comment how to make fbox produce similar result to boxed from amsmath when used inside display math?
Thanks again. But I do not think I explained my problem well. I can't add \mathfbox from the GUI. So I have no way to use it when using SW. The issue is that SW generates the fbox and I can only add code to preamble to fix things, but can't edit the code or add code inside the document, since SW will not understand it if it does not supports it in the GUI. The fix has to be to do it all in the preamble only. This way I can still use the GUI but get the correct output when I compile. I hope this explain the problem better.
Sep
11
comment how to make fbox produce similar result to boxed from amsmath when used inside display math?
Thanks. But is there a way to write some macro in preamble to do this? i.e. without having to edit the generated code itself? I can't edit the code generated each time and fix this by hand as I mentioned I use SW GUI to generate this code and it is not practical to edit this each time I make changes. Also SW does not understand this new code any more and so it does not display correctly on the screen any more. Here is screen shot from SW to explain the issue !Mathematica graphics
Sep
11
asked how to make fbox produce similar result to boxed from amsmath when used inside display math?
Sep
8
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
7
accepted how to redefine \begin{align*} … \end{align*} to \begin{eqnarray*} … \end{eqnarray*}
Sep
7
accepted Vertical alignment of table rows with images. PDF vs. HTML generated by htlatex
Sep
7
accepted Bad mathchar (79119) using htlatex+mathml with \uparrow with align from amsmath package
Sep
7
accepted how to disable/enable etoolbox global command effect at different locations in a document?
Sep
5
accepted Error using htlatex with tikz forest package, invalid SVG generated
Aug
27
comment lstlistings: framed code
@davidg non-of the solutions below (with auto-adjustment of width) work for verbatim that extends over one page. The text is chopped off if it is longer than one page.
Aug
27
comment lstlistings: framed code
fyi, this solution does not work, as it chops off any verbatim if it is over one page long.
Aug
27
comment lstlistings: framed code
fyi, this solution does not work, as it chops off any verbatim if it is over one page long.
Aug
27
accepted why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
Aug
27
comment why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
Ok, will look at listing. But this all works fine with \begin{Verbatim}[frame=single]. I do not want to include text from files. The verbatim text is already inside the latex document. Only reason I was looking at fancybox here, is to make the box fit tight around the text, which \begin{Verbatim}[frame=single] does not do and has no option to do that. I assumed listing works only with reading text from files, but will check on it now. As long as I can get a frame that fits tight around the text, and does not get chopped at the end of the page, then I can use listing instead. Thanks.
Aug
27
comment why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
thanks. But verbatimbox has the same issue I wrote about in my comment to Herbert above. For verbatim that is too long, the box gets chopped off and I lose verbatim text if the is longer than one page. This problem do not happen with \begin{Verbatim}[frame=single]
Aug
27
comment why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
screen shot !Mathematica graphics
Aug
27
comment why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
fyi, I have found another issue with this, which I am not able to resolve. May be you can. What happens is this: If the verbatim text is too long, the fbox does not overflow to the next page, but gets chopped off at the end of the page, and any remaining verbatim text is lost. i.e. if I just use \begin{Verbatim}{frame=single}... this problem do not happen, and the frame continue to next page, for as many pages as needed for large verbatim text. But not with the above. I'll post screen show below to show the difference.
Aug
27
comment why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
Thanks, but actually all the options being passed via [frame=single] and others like it, has no effect. Actually without [frame=single] it still works as is. Another thing I tried is \begin{SaveVerbatim}[frame=single,framerule=2pt]... and the line thickness did not change. I think all these options do not work for some reason like they do with normal \begin{Verbatim}[frame=single,framerule=2pt,samepage...] and I can't figure out why. I wish they did.
Aug
27
asked why first line is missing using fancybox BVerbatim?
Aug
20
revised tex4ht removes spaces in array column when including a package even if the package is not used
added more packages found