meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 6 months |
| seen | 4 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 736 |
|
5h |
comment |
How to remove xdata entries using biber --tool_resolve --tool (after resolution) Updated answer with a config file mapping option for removing any resolved XDATA entries in a separate biber run. |
|
5h |
revised |
How to remove xdata entries using biber --tool_resolve --tool (after resolution) added 496 characters in body |
|
5h |
answered | How to remove xdata entries using biber --tool_resolve --tool (after resolution) |
|
1d |
comment |
Sorting swedish index with makeidx correctly It's not an easy problem as sorting Swedish correctly requires either dedicated Swedish support in the tool or, as it increasingly common, real UTF-8 support. In fact this isn't quite enough either as the tool needs to support CLDR tailoring of the Unicode Collation algorithm as this is needed to sort Swedish correctly. biblatex+biber can do this for Swedish in bibliography sorting as it supports UTF-8 plus CLDR but for indexing, xindy, as far as I know, uses its own custom modules and doesn't support a real Unicode Collation algorithm. |
|
1d |
comment |
biblatex-apa: Author's first name is repeated in brackets Also, I'd like to add that turning uniquename off is not APA compliant. It's better to make sure your .bib knows which authors are actually the same by using initials or full names. |
|
1d |
comment |
Converting from biblatex to BibTeX format using biber I've added the appropriate things to the answer. |
|
1d |
revised |
Converting from biblatex to BibTeX format using biber added 3207 characters in body |
|
2d |
answered | Converting from biblatex to BibTeX format using biber |
|
May 16 |
comment |
biblatex is ignoring maxcitenames Yes, it's always better to modify the default styles. Specialist styles like APA have some very tricky requirements which have to be coded into the style and are therefore not easy or impossible to change with standards biblatex package options. In fact I have added some such options to the package for some simple cases but after all, it's an APA style so adding options to make it non-APA compliant becomes suspect after a while ... |
|
May 16 |
answered | biblatex is ignoring maxcitenames |
|
May 13 |
answered | Using BibTool with BibLaTeX, again |
|
May 12 |
comment |
Using BibTool with BibLaTeX, again What exactly are you trying to do? biber has a "tool" mode now which can output .bib instead of .bbl - this allows you to (re)encode, change entries with complex remapping etc. and then output a .bib based on the changes. It's a bit more semantic than bibtool as the changes are based on an internal data model instead of the syntax of a raw file. |
|
May 12 |
comment |
Language-specific removal of diacritics from text and bibliography New versions of biblatex and biber should be in TL now. |
|
May 4 |
comment |
BibLatex Cite Primary Source Within Book This is best done with "related entries" using the RELATED* fields. See the biblatex doc and the related entries example file which comes with biblatex. If you do it this way (which requires biber) the primary and secondary sources each have their own entries which means they can be used/reused in other ways by other entries or cited on their own etc. |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Improving a workflow for importing BibTeX citations You might also consider switching to biblatex+biber as biber can open remote .bib data sources directly with no importing or downloading at all. |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Best practice: define BibLateX/BibTeX entry with title in native language and in English Just to note that we are working on a multi-lingual major update to biblatex/biber which will allow you to specify multiple language/script variants of fields in the same entry. This is a lot of work but is progressing quite well so far. |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Reversed name in shorthand division of bibliography We need to see the bibliography - how are you defining your shorthands? |
|
May 2 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 2 |
comment |
Biblatex: 2 custom fields, only one is working Just a couple of comments - you can omit skipout=false as this is the default. Also, you need \DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{mynote} too. This declares "mynote" as valid for all entrytypes and the macro you mentioned defines its type. |
|
May 2 |
revised |
Biblatex: 2 custom fields, only one is working typo |
