| bio | website | navarroj.com/latex |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | 32 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 10 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 956 |
A computer science lecturer at University College London. I do stuff in logic, theorem proving, program analysis and verification. I'm a very enthusiastic TeX/LaTeX user, most days.
I also run a small site for LaTeX beginners in spanish: LaTeX Fácil.
|
Sep 29 |
awarded | Great Question |
|
Sep 28 |
awarded | Good Answer |
|
Sep 21 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Sep 7 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Sep 6 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography @Audrey, thanks for the pointer. I've just added a post there. |
|
Sep 6 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography @Audrey I understand. But then, is it actually possible to break a bibliography into sections with different citation orders? Or this remains non-implemented yet? I am also a bit confused then, as well, about the meaning of defernumbers. |
|
Sep 6 |
awarded | Investor |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography Yes, for a moment I also thought that this was the problem, but I've checked and the problem persists even after running pdflatex + biber + pdflatex + pdflatex. Do you get the same result if you typeset on your own system? |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography Yes. The option is activated in my minimal example. |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography I'm having trouble getting your solution to work. I've updated the question to reflect this. Do you think you could provide me some help? Or should I better start a new question? |
|
Sep 5 |
revised |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography added 199 characters in body |
|
Sep 4 |
revised |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography added 1777 characters in body |
|
Sep 4 |
comment |
Different sorting schemes in different sections of bibliography It seems that this functionality is now available. Would you care to update your answer to provide an example on how to do this? |
|
Aug 29 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Aug 17 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Aug 16 |
accepted | What to do to switch to biblatex? |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
Advantages and disadvantages of fully expandable macros Your first sentence made me wonder. For a suitable/sensible definition of "expandable", do we know the complexity/expressibility of TeX expansion? (if it's not Turing-complete, what is it?) |
|
Aug 6 |
awarded | Good Answer |
|
Aug 3 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jul 27 |
awarded | Yearling |