bmu
Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
5
Impact
~745 people reached

• 0 posts edited

# 13 Actions

 Feb15 awarded Nice Question Dec9 comment Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns But in my case I really have high uncertainties, so this would be 7.5(106) I think. From my experience this is not usual in my scientific field to give the uncertainties in that way. Further more I would like to be able to give uncertainties, which are not symmetric, something like `+4/-2` which is not possible with the brackets. But you are right with the table format, something like `S[table-format=2.1+-2.1]` perhaps would be clearer. Is this an option? Dec9 awarded Scholar Dec9 accepted Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns Dec9 comment Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns @JosephWright What I would like to have is the ability to write something like `S[table-format=2.1(2.1)]` in this case. I don't really understand your comment. Is something wrong with is approach? Dec9 comment Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns @ThorstenDonig The numbers are trends and resulting uncertainties of a linear linear regression. They are quite big, but they are uncertainties. However it doesn't help to answer my question. Or do you mean to give the uncertainties in a different way? Dec9 revised Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns used fromatting from the comment Dec9 comment Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns @cgnieder thank you. I didn't really understood `table-format` I think. For my question I would need something like `2.1(2.1)` I think, but this doesn't work. Dec6 awarded Student Dec6 awarded Editor Dec6 revised Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns hope to make it clearer Dec6 asked Align numbers and separated uncertainties in tables with S columns Jul29 awarded Supporter