network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Nov 14 '12 at 12:46 | |
| stats | profile views | 6 |
|
Aug 9 |
comment |
Apacite - Different citation output for multiple authors Since it only redefines those two commands, I suspect it won't work with \fullciteauthor... Your solution seems more comprehensive then. Again, thanks. |
|
Aug 9 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 9 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 9 |
accepted | Apacite - Different citation output for multiple authors |
|
Aug 9 |
comment |
Apacite - Different citation output for multiple authors Thank you lockstep! It works perfect. Plus, I got the following (also working) solution from the apacite package \let\oldcite\cite
\def\cite{%
\renewcommand{\BOthers}[1]{et al.\hbox{}}
\oldcite
}
\let\oldciteA\citeA
\def\citeA{%
\renewcommand{\BOthers}[1]{and collaborators}
\oldciteA
} Anyway, excelent answer from you and got my problem solved! |
|
Aug 7 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 6 |
revised |
Apacite - Different citation output for multiple authors added salutation and the tag apa-style |
|
Aug 6 |
asked | Apacite - Different citation output for multiple authors |
