620 reputation
1314
bio website freealgview.blogspot.com
location
age
visits member for 2 years
seen Nov 11 at 12:15

Dec
18
revised splitbib and table of contents
added 109 characters in body
Dec
18
asked splitbib and table of contents
Dec
18
revised Parentheses in thebibliography environment
rolled back to a previous revision
Dec
18
accepted Parentheses in thebibliography environment
Dec
18
awarded  Cleanup
Dec
18
revised Parentheses in thebibliography environment
rolled back to a previous revision
Dec
18
revised Parentheses in thebibliography environment
Change to a minimal example.
Dec
18
comment Parentheses in thebibliography environment
But I think natbib doesn't work without BibTeX.
Dec
18
asked Parentheses in thebibliography environment
Nov
15
accepted Creating and using commands/counters which name depends on other counter
Nov
14
awarded  Nice Question
Nov
14
comment Is a PDF output from a LaTeX document, a “derived work” from the LPPL standard packages?
A modification is any derivate work (definitions section). Thus, LPPL concerns my question. But you have reason. NO. But not for your reasons, but because an automatic process of a work is a reproduction, and thus, the same legal status (copyright and license) of the original work. Thus, a PDF output has the copyright and license my source code has. Thus, the LPPL of the packages don't apply to my source code, neither its PDF output.
Nov
14
comment Is a PDF output from a LaTeX document, a “derived work” from the LPPL standard packages?
This I have learned a few minutes ago: an "automatic or mechanic" transformation of a work, isn't a derivate work, but a reproduction of this work (it depends on the country, but more or less this is the idea). Moreover, a reproduction of a work has the copyright of the original work, and thus, you can use/modify/distribute it with the same conditions as the original work.
Nov
14
accepted Is a PDF output from a LaTeX document, a “derived work” from the LPPL standard packages?
Nov
14
asked Is a PDF output from a LaTeX document, a “derived work” from the LPPL standard packages?
Nov
11
comment License in LaTeX document, packages and answers
I understand. I search for other sources to solve my question. Thank you very much.
Nov
11
comment License in LaTeX document, packages and answers
It's better to move this question to meta.tex.stackexchange.com ? Although here more users participate.
Nov
11
comment License in LaTeX document, packages and answers
What do you mean with "localtion-dependent"?
Nov
11
asked License in LaTeX document, packages and answers
Nov
9
comment Matrix from graph description
Wow! Thank you so much. You, and in general users in this forum, impress me.