| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | 4 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 101 |
|
2d |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jun 9 |
comment |
How to plot a surface from a set of data? Thank you for the gnuplot solution, may be not the best one, but it's great to know how to do it in that program. |
|
Jun 8 |
comment |
How to plot a surface from a set of data? Something similar that works with MATLAB? Or it's just octave because it works from terminal? And with gnuplot? I don't have octave and I would prefer not to install it. Great answer, by the way. |
|
Jun 8 |
comment |
Writing readable LaTeX @AndrewSwann I think the only reason to like the difference between start and stop symbols is that you need it. If you use a good editor you know (with colors, shape,... ) what's inside math and what's outside, and then you don't (really) need to differentiate them. And, another example is $(u,v)$ vs. \((u,v)\). I lose myself in the second one. By the way, thank you for the comment, every one has his own preferences. |
|
Jun 6 |
accepted | Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package |
|
Jun 6 |
comment |
Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package That was fast. It's done. This is not a question at this moment. Anyway, thank you. |
|
Jun 5 |
asked | Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @percusse I don't know how to correct it, if you want you can do it, if not, I will rewrite the answer only talking about the space after the quantifiers and the \quads. |
|
May 22 |
revised |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? Change the order of the options in the image as that could be problematic. |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @JohnWickerson and Percusse If you still think I'm wrong, feel free to edit and correct the answer the answer. |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @percusse Emmm, still not full aware of what you are saying. I wrote And, in second place, I don't know how your example should be read… and then put both options. If it is read as the first then I would swap order and write one thing, if it is read as the second then the phrase absolutely changes it's meaning and I would write it in another way. I never meant both to mean the same, in fact, I tried to differentiate them even more. Is that it? Sorry guys… |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @percusse My answer to that is: Of course. But then I think, may be I misunderstood part of the question. Shouldn't it change if I swap the order? May be in logic (which I don't know) it shouldn't. My point was only to add the space after the quantifiers and show the \quads as useful mathematical spaces. If I'm wrong, please correct me, it's true I know nothing about logic. |
|
May 21 |
revised |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? added 317 characters in body |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @GastónBurrull About the \,, yes, it works (I used \mkern2mu to show how to adjust it). By the way the \quad if it's in a \displaymath I think it's much better than \ because it clearly separates the sentence. |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @GastónBurrull Okey, but I wrote an answer anyway. |
|
May 21 |
answered | Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? @egreg In my opinion if they are part of a \displaymath, e.g. in definitions, I think is clearer (and easy to remember) to write the symbols. |
|
May 21 |
comment |
Best practice for typesetting quantifiers? Apart from what others are answering. I personally think that the space AFTER the quantifiers is horrible. I usually add space \let\existstemp\exists \renewcommand*{\exists}{\existstemp\mkern1mu} (I don't exactly remember the space, I wrote the 1mu as an example). |
|
May 21 |
comment |
pgfplots to plot a function from [4,4.001] By the way, instead of $time$/$acceleration$ in the labels we should write \textit{...} if we want italic text or simply ... if we want it upright. Not the math mode. |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Extensible \vec instead of \overrightarrow After trying a little I ended with -4.5pt which I think adapts better (in the \amsvectb). By the way, I would like the \amsvectb to be lower (a little nearer to the letters of the argument). After that, if nobody cames up with a better solution I accept your answer. |