1,505 reputation
216
bio website
location
age
visits member for 7 months
seen 4 hours ago
stats profile views 101

2d
awarded  Nice Question
Jun
9
comment How to plot a surface from a set of data?
Thank you for the gnuplot solution, may be not the best one, but it's great to know how to do it in that program.
Jun
8
comment How to plot a surface from a set of data?
Something similar that works with MATLAB? Or it's just octave because it works from terminal? And with gnuplot? I don't have octave and I would prefer not to install it. Great answer, by the way.
Jun
8
comment Writing readable LaTeX
@AndrewSwann I think the only reason to like the difference between start and stop symbols is that you need it. If you use a good editor you know (with colors, shape,... ) what's inside math and what's outside, and then you don't (really) need to differentiate them. And, another example is $(u,v)$ vs. \((u,v)\). I lose myself in the second one. By the way, thank you for the comment, every one has his own preferences.
Jun
6
accepted Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package
Jun
6
comment Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package
That was fast. It's done. This is not a question at this moment. Anyway, thank you.
Jun
5
asked Problem between opticals and minionint options in the MinionPro package
May
22
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@percusse I don't know how to correct it, if you want you can do it, if not, I will rewrite the answer only talking about the space after the quantifiers and the \quads.
May
22
revised Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
Change the order of the options in the image as that could be problematic.
May
22
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@JohnWickerson and Percusse If you still think I'm wrong, feel free to edit and correct the answer the answer.
May
22
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@percusse Emmm, still not full aware of what you are saying. I wrote And, in second place, I don't know how your example should be read… and then put both options. If it is read as the first then I would swap order and write one thing, if it is read as the second then the phrase absolutely changes it's meaning and I would write it in another way. I never meant both to mean the same, in fact, I tried to differentiate them even more. Is that it? Sorry guys…
May
22
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@percusse My answer to that is: Of course. But then I think, may be I misunderstood part of the question. Shouldn't it change if I swap the order? May be in logic (which I don't know) it shouldn't. My point was only to add the space after the quantifiers and show the \quads as useful mathematical spaces. If I'm wrong, please correct me, it's true I know nothing about logic.
May
21
revised Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
added 317 characters in body
May
21
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@GastónBurrull About the \,, yes, it works (I used \mkern2mu to show how to adjust it). By the way the \quad if it's in a \displaymath I think it's much better than \ because it clearly separates the sentence.
May
21
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@GastónBurrull Okey, but I wrote an answer anyway.
May
21
answered Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
May
21
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
@egreg In my opinion if they are part of a \displaymath, e.g. in definitions, I think is clearer (and easy to remember) to write the symbols.
May
21
comment Best practice for typesetting quantifiers?
Apart from what others are answering. I personally think that the space AFTER the quantifiers is horrible. I usually add space \let\existstemp\exists \renewcommand*{\exists}{\existstemp\mkern1mu} (I don't exactly remember the space, I wrote the 1mu as an example).
May
21
comment pgfplots to plot a function from [4,4.001]
By the way, instead of $time$/$acceleration$ in the labels we should write \textit{...} if we want italic text or simply ... if we want it upright. Not the math mode.
May
17
comment Extensible \vec instead of \overrightarrow
After trying a little I ended with -4.5pt which I think adapts better (in the \amsvectb). By the way, I would like the \amsvectb to be lower (a little nearer to the letters of the argument). After that, if nobody cames up with a better solution I accept your answer.