meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 3 months |
| seen | Feb 13 at 8:47 | |
| stats | profile views | 9 |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? Thanks a lot Audrey, will look into this! |
|
Feb 13 |
accepted | How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? |
|
Feb 12 |
comment |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? Thanks Audrey, I rephrased my question now. |
|
Feb 12 |
revised |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? rephrased question to make it clearer |
|
Feb 12 |
comment |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? Thanks, that would explain things! Is there any way to add title case capitalization to the bibliography (except by changing each entry's casing by hand..)? |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? So, you mean that biblatex-chicago is not automatically up-casing anything, but simply refraining from down-casing the titles? |
|
Feb 11 |
revised |
How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? added 16 characters in body |
|
Feb 11 |
asked | How to get BibLaTeX-chicago use title case capitalization? |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} Massive thanks! Exactly what I was looking for! |
|
Feb 6 |
accepted | First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} |
|
Feb 5 |
comment |
natbib: modifying citation style for particular source type, while others remain default Good to know, thanks! |
|
Feb 5 |
revised |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} added 273 characters in body; edited title |
|
Feb 5 |
comment |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} That's true, I just thought this clumsy way would perhaps be an easier way of solving it. But I guess it probably really is wiser to alter the first/subsequent behaviour of \autocite, which is why I've edited by question once again.. |
|
Feb 5 |
revised |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} added 273 characters in body; edited title |
|
Feb 5 |
comment |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} My idea was to use \autocite for first citations and \autocite* for follow-up citations, mainly because using \autocite for follow-ups drops the title altogether (which I don't want either), while \autocite* does everything it should. So my question then does not really refer to follow-up citations, but primarily hopes to change the behaviour of \autocite while leaving \autocite* the way it currently is... does that make sense? |
|
Feb 5 |
revised |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} Rephrased question and title to (hopefully) remove ambiguities. |
|
Feb 5 |
comment |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} @lockstep: thank you for your comment, you are quite right about that. I have tried to rephrase both the question body and title, hopefully that helped. |
|
Feb 5 |
revised |
First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} Rephrased question and title to (hopefully) remove ambiguities. |
|
Feb 5 |
asked | First full title, then short title in \autocite: biblatex-chicago authordate with entrysubtype={classical} |
