meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 9 months |
| seen | 1 hour ago | |
| stats | profile views | 51 |
finance PhD student
|
Jun 24 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Jun 16 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
May 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation @MikeRenfro -- Ah, thanks for the link to the workflow section! I will give this a try (but AndrewStacey has a very good point about my attempts to shave 15 minutes at the cost of boring an audience to death). Please post as an answer and I'll accept. |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation @AndrewStacey -- Thanks for the grounding! Good point. The clean slate approach has serious advantages over trying to save 15 minutes here and there. Thanks! |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation +1 for Sweave (knitr is next on the list for me to learn)! |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation Maybe the laziest/lamest example would be keeping the section titles and organization the same. Or keeping the same tables and graphs in both files. |
|
May 14 |
comment |
Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation @MikeRenfro -- Yes (although I didn't know about beamerarticle, which will come in handy elsewhere, I'm sure). I am just looking for any tips/tricks/packages on making the presentation match the paper. There may not be any other than starting the beamer file from a relatively finished version of the paper then updating the presentation as the paper evolves. |
|
May 14 |
asked | Tips and tricks to tightly couple LaTeX paper and Beamer presentation |
|
Mar 7 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) @Werner -- Thanks for two good lessons on thinking outside the box! |
|
Feb 28 |
accepted | Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) Where can I find bibentry? I can't find it in the TexLive package manager on a Win 7 install. Thanks! |
|
Feb 28 |
revised |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) Claified that I am using bibtex |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) @Werner -- No, bibtex. In the near term I won't have the time/energy to switch, but should I add that to my todo list? Other than this odd request I have been very happy with the bibtex feature set. |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) @Mico -- Brilliant! I wanted to have one reference for the subject paper (I am a PhD student writing paper summaries for a seminar), but I can leave that off. Your solution is much more practical and lets me get full citations later. Thanks! Should I close this question? |
|
Feb 28 |
revised |
Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) Fixed bad grammar in title |
|
Feb 28 |
asked | Cite in body of document, but omit from references (i.e., opposite of \nocite) |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jan 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
