Reputation
20,632
Next tag badge:
157/100 score
14/20 answers
Badges
2 47 103
Newest
 Enlightened
Impact
~815k people reached

Feb
15
comment biblatex: numbering of “overlapping” bibliographies
Could be complete nonsense (have no manual available), but have you tried leaving the defernumbers option?
Feb
3
comment How to remove http://dx.doi.org string from doi field in BibTeX style?
I agree with @DG': BibTeX entries exported by scientific databases can almost never be taken "as is" – they simply contain too many errors (e.g., forced title capitalization, wrong escaping of special characters, ...). Basically, one has to edit them anyway, the doi-is-url issue is just another nuisance.
Jan
20
comment TeXShop doesn't remember file encoding
@cfr: For kate I have provided some more details in tex.stackexchange.com/questions/89859/… If you google for the example, you will easily find more.
Jan
13
comment How can you create a vertical timeline?
+1 for handcrafted solution :-)
Dec
22
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
@egreg: With pdftex the resulting PDF contains a visible line that, according to Adobe Illustrator, is 0 pt thick :-)
Dec
21
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
Alright, I found the culprit: I did all my tests with LaTeXit, which is kind of nice for small tests. However, if one saves the PDF, LaTeXit apparently pipes it through the MacOS Quartz engine, which caused the effect. If I compile with pdflatex directly, it works: 0.1004pt (or simpler: 0.01bp) gives the right thickness.
Dec
21
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
Hm... that yields 0.18 pt in Adobe Illustrator (which makes sense, if the previous result was 0.179). Something strange is going on...
Dec
21
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
Aaarg! I know that TeX points are not points. How could I forget that...
Dec
21
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
This yields lines with 0.0179, 0.0161, ..., 0.0107, ..., 0,0018 pt. The 0.0107 comes pretty close, have to try if that works.
Dec
21
comment TikZ/TeX: Minimum line width/maximum resolution
@Kpym: I have tried it, result the same: 0.0179 pt
Dec
20
comment Why do people still use Postscript?
@AlexG: Good comparison! However, as a matter of fact fewer and fewer tools are able to generate PS out of the box, so what publishers actually get is PS that has been converted from PDF. To stay into you picture this would be C code generated by a disassembler/decompiler out of the binary. I doubt that this is more editable than the PDF directly.
Dec
19
comment Calling macro fails with error \inaccessible
@jlinkels: I strongly feel with you! Well, you should admit yourself that the error message was not exactly helpful to find the culprit.
Dec
19
comment LaTeX vs Word; improvements of LaTeX over the years
@barbarabeeton: Thanks for mentioning snapshot! For some years I have been maintaining a project-specific texmf tree for every project that uses "critical" packages (especially biblatex...). However, "criticality" was purely subjective here – I added a package if something did not work with some colleagues TeX installation. snapshot seems to be the missing link to systematically maintain version dependencies!
Dec
19
comment LaTeX vs Word; improvements of LaTeX over the years
@CarlWitthoft: Just for curiosity I did: No problems at all to open it in a current version of Word.
Dec
18
comment LaTeX vs Word; improvements of LaTeX over the years
Hm... might work today with a plain document from 2000, but I am not so sure about it in 2030 with a LaTeX document from today. I have experienced too many problems reusing documents less than three years old if they employed modern packages or classes, such as biblatex, libertine, tikz, moderncv. Unfortunately, issues with back-compatibility are no longer a privilege of Word and Co.
Dec
15
comment Lyx: export with tracking changes to pdf
Glad you found it :-) Please also accept your answer (click the tick so it becomes green), as it, well, answers the question.
Dec
15
comment Why do people still use Postscript?
Is this really a problem? I guess your machine happily changes a zillion occurrences in basically no time :-). No, seriously: This is a valid concern, but I would like to understand it's long term impact. So is the worse editability a fundamental problem of PDF ("can never be solved") or is it just a matter of yet missing tools?
Dec
11
comment Why do people still use Postscript?
@percusse: I know the linked question and answers and also quite a bit about PS features. I just think all this misses the point. IMHO, the question is not "what could be done with PS", but "what could only be done with PS" in the context of document typesetting. Is their any "killer feature" wrt. document processing that causes publishers to still insist on PS, because with PDF they could not produce adequate results? I strongly doubt this and think the only reason is: History. The old PS tool chain just works and updating it to PDF would cost money.
Dec
11
comment Why do people still use Postscript?
All this is right, but IMHO misses the point. What exactly is the benefit of having the printer to solve the differential equations? What cannot be done with PDF?
Dec
5
comment Options for tikzcd
every matrix/.append style={/tikz/column 2/.style=red} might already do it.