meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Honolulu, HI | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | May 19 at 8:20 | |
| stats | profile views | 19 |
|
May 19 |
answered | REVTEX 4.1 and PeerX-Press LaTeX workflow |
|
May 19 |
comment |
REVTEX 4.1 and PeerX-Press LaTeX workflow I agree, the file sizes submitted to the journal do not matter at all. The important thing is that I can render the same source files through pdfLaTeX to get a reasonably sized PDF without any additional file conversions (other than the internal eps2pdf). I'll have a look at sam2p. |
|
May 18 |
asked | REVTEX 4.1 and PeerX-Press LaTeX workflow |
|
Mar 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Dec 13 |
awarded | Tumbleweed |
|
Dec 6 |
asked | Create a BibDesk group from a document .bbl file |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
Make backrefs invisible in hardcopy @KeksDose The purpose of the option backref=page is to place links to the relevant pages at the end of each bib entry. So this is not part of my question, I am only interested in making sure that those page references only appear in soft-copy. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Make backrefs invisible in hardcopy @KeksDose What I would like is for the page numbers of those four backrefs to be displayed as separate links in the PDF file e.g. [10,13,18], but not have these backrefs display at all in the hardcopy |
|
Nov 30 |
asked | Make backrefs invisible in hardcopy |
|
Nov 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Hidden environment @doncherry Thanks for the tip, looks like [comments] was the key. The keywords I tried all came up dry. You can close this question. |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Hidden environment @doncherry The linked question does point to the comment package which I think is all I need. This would not have been an easy answer for me to find though. I wonder how the language can be improved to help search for something like this. |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Hidden environment I also just came across tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17816/… |
|
Oct 9 |
asked | Hidden environment |
|
Oct 3 |
accepted | Problem formatting a subscript in math mode |
|
Oct 2 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 2 |
revised |
Problem formatting a subscript in math mode added 52 characters in body |
|
Oct 2 |
comment |
Problem formatting a subscript in math mode @Mico Good tip on \newcommand. I have at least a dozen of these in my document for common symbols that can only be written in math mode. |
|
Oct 2 |
comment |
Problem formatting a subscript in math mode @AndrewSwann amsmath did the trick. \textsc{\tiny fwhm} Is the final solution. Using lower case fwhm makes all the difference compared with \textsc{\tiny FWHM} or any other combination. Post an answer and I'll accept. |
