network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | May 19 at 21:26 | |
| stats | profile views | 20 |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz Could you give me the value of the key text align? I can then use \pgfkeys{/my search path/.unknown/.code=
{ \let\searchname=\pgfkeyscurrentname \pgfkeysalso{... |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz I guess my problem's related to tex.stackexchange.com/questions/6731/…, though the solution there doesn't help either. |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz Even if I use all libraries as in newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.text.tex/2009-04/…;, I still get the error message from above. |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz My log file says: Package: pgf 2008/01/15 v2.00 (rcs-revision 1.12). Going to check the pgfkeys package documentation now... |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz MWE = Minimal Working Environment? I have included an SFE (small failing environment), hope my bug jumps right into your eye ;) |
|
Nov 20 |
revised |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz added 1630 characters in body |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Curved text (on multiple lines) within curved arrow using tikz Looks great. Unfortunately, I get the pdflatex error ERROR: Package pgfkeys Error: I do not know the key '/pgf/decoration/text align' and I am going to ignore it. Perhaps you misspelled it. I did use \usetikzlibrary{decorations.text} and he seems to find that library, since that line doesn't give errors. |
|
Oct 19 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? Just put it into my text and zoomed all the way in. It's beautiful, man! Thx again. |
|
Oct 19 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? This is even better than what I was thinking about. Thus this is my (final?) accepted answer. |
|
Oct 19 |
accepted | Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? |
|
Oct 19 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? This was exactly what I was thinking about. Thus this was my second accepted answer. |
|
Oct 19 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? Nice solution (+1). This was my first accepted answer... |
|
Oct 19 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? Wow, very sophisticated solution (+1). Are you typographically educated and chose the large distance of the separate lines from the original quantifiers on purpose? To me, a little closer looks sweeter... |
|
Oct 18 |
revised |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? one further example |
|
Oct 18 |
suggested | suggested edit on Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? |
|
Oct 18 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? Thanks for the anser (+1). \myforall would be great if the additional line was a bit longer. Any ideas how to do that? |
|
Oct 18 |
revised |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? added alternative font |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Is there another symbol that is slightly different from \forall (likewise for \exists)? @Count Zero: Thanks for the comprehensive list. I only found \fgeA from the fge package, and it does not look as good as the answers below (and \fgeE does not exist). |
