meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 21 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | Mar 31 at 20:31 | |
| stats | profile views | 4 |
|
Nov 24 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Nov 10 |
accepted | Babel and the decimal separator |
|
Nov 9 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 9 |
comment |
Babel and the decimal separator Does the fact that it "disables completely the decimal separator mechanism" have any drawbacks? I.e. what else does it do, besides changing the comma to a dot? |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Babel and the decimal separator Yes it did, thanks. I wish I could accept your comment as a right answer. |
|
Nov 8 |
comment |
Babel and the decimal separator Should say I've seen a lot of related questions, but none actually like this one (or none that I could find). Most are about changing the period to a comma instead. |
|
Nov 8 |
asked | Babel and the decimal separator |
|
Oct 31 |
comment |
Reducing the spaces before and after \smallsetminus Middle lines are exactly what I needed, thank you. |
|
Oct 31 |
accepted | Reducing the spaces before and after \smallsetminus |
|
Oct 29 |
comment |
Reducing the spaces before and after \smallsetminus I see what you mean, it also looks wrong to me. But I don't like the second line either. It looks particularly bad in the actual text I'm writing: $\mathbb{I}\smallsetminus\{0\}$. |
|
Oct 29 |
asked | Reducing the spaces before and after \smallsetminus |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref Yeah it did, thanks. Silly me for not checking that. |
|
Feb 10 |
comment |
Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref Here's the output: File List article.cls 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class size12.clo 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option) amsmath.sty 2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features amstext.sty 2000/06/29 v2.01 amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0 amsbsy.sty 1999/11/29 v1.2d amsopn.sty 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names amsthm.sty 2004/08/06 v2.20 cleveref.sty 2009/11/02 v0.12 Intelligent cross-referencing *********** I can't believe I didn't think of checking to see whether my distribution of cleverer was up to date or not, though... |
|
Feb 10 |
revised |
Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref added 24 characters in body |
|
Feb 10 |
comment |
Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref @cmhughes That's not the problem, that's just a typo in the MWE. I fixed it, copied it into Texshop, and I'm still getting the same problem (I get "Hence, by ?? 0.1"). |
|
Feb 10 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Feb 10 |
revised |
Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref deleted 1 characters in body |
|
Feb 10 |
asked | Cross-referencing with amsthm and cleveref |
|
Feb 8 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Feb 4 |
accepted | Error with \newcommand and \section |
