8

When stating LP problems I usually use something along the following

\begin{tabular}{ l c p{1pt} c }
max     & \multicolumn{3}{l}{$300x + 100y$} \\
s.t.    & $6x + 3y$ & $\leq$ & $40$\\
        & $x - 3y$  & $\leq$ & $0$ \\
        & $x + \frac{1}{4}y$ & $\leq$ & $4$ \\
\end{tabular}

But this forces the use of inline math, and require me to adjust column width manually (and it's still not perfect since the spacing between the right hand side and left hand side of \leq is wrong).

What I really would like was a solution that allowed for display math, with correct spacing and no need for manual formatting with p{}.

How would I write a version that fixes this?

2
  • 1
    Something like an array environment would probably suffice here (see the first answer on this question; I don’t have time for a full answer right now).
    – alexwlchan
    Feb 16, 2014 at 22:41
  • 1
    A good thing is to read the fine document MathMode.pdf of Herbert Voß. Feb 16, 2014 at 22:56

4 Answers 4

10

To get the wider spacing associated with display-style math, you could use a combination of the gather* and aligned environments (both provided by the amsmath package):

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{gather*}
\max_{x,y}\quad 300x + 100y \\
\begin{aligned}
\textup{s.t.}\quad 6x + 3y  &\leq  40\\
                   x - 3y  &\leq  0 \\
         x + \tfrac{1}{4}y  &\leq  4 \\
\end{aligned}
\end{gather*}
\end{document}
1
5

Using the array environment, you can do as follows:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}

\begin{equation*}
\setlength\arraycolsep{1.5pt}
  \begin{array}{l@{\quad} r c r c r}
    \max          & 300x & + &         100y &      &    \\
    \mathrm{s.t.} &   6x & + &           3y & \geq & 40 \\
                  &    x & - &           3y & \geq &  0 \\
                  &    x & + & \frac{1}{4}y & \geq &  4
  \end{array}
\end{equation*}

\end{document}

output

This gives a proper alignment IMHO.

5

This is an old question but since of april 23, 2019, exists also a specific package for the formatting the linear programs named optidef, very fast and simple.

I have put the parameter |s| (to write only max and not maximize), and the option <b> it is uses for to create a break on the objective to have a blank space. Here there is a MWE:

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{optidef}


\begin{document}
\begin{maxi*}|s|<b>
{\scriptstyle x,y}{300x + 100y}{}{}%%%% <----objective
\addConstraint {6x+3y}{\leq 40}{}
\addConstraint {x-3y}{\leq  0}{}
\addConstraint {x+\tfrac{1}{4} y}{\leq  4}{}
\end{maxi*}
\end{document}

enter image description here

3

The gather environment is working well in this example only because the objective function and the constraints have similar sizes.

If you don't need to align the objective function with your constraints, you can nest an array in an align environment:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}

\begin{document}

\begin{align*}
    &\mathrm{max} \quad 300x + 100y  \\[2pt] % if you need space between objectif and constraints
    &\mathrm{s.t.} \quad 
    \begin{array}[t]{r c r c r}
         6x & + &           3y & \geq & 40 \\
          x & - &           3y & \geq &  0 \\
          x & + & \frac{1}{4}y & \geq &  4
     \end{array}
\end{align*}

\end{document}

enter image description here

I have noticed that the \max command does not align very well in the align environment, I have replaced it by \mathrm{max}.

1
  • Welcome to TeX.SE!
    – Mensch
    Feb 5, 2021 at 13:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .