It's easy to make subscripts in math mode: $a_i$
.
How do I make a subscript outside math environment, likethis?
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityNote that \textsubscript
enters math mode as well. This might produce problems in PDF strings where math is not allowed, for instance in bookmarks. If you used hyperref and simply used \textsubscript
in a section heading, hyperref would complain about the math shift. The command \texorpdfstring
comes to the rescue:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fixltx2e}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\begin{document}
\section{\texorpdfstring{like\textsubscript{this}}{like this}}
\end{document}
That applies to math and math symbols in sectioning headings of course as well.
Since 2015, LaTeX provides the fixltx2e features by default, so you can omit \usepackage{fixltx2e}
then.
\texorpdfstring
command is in the hyperref package. Would any other package have problems with this?
Aug 4, 2010 at 14:12
\pdfoutline goto page 1 {/Fit} count 0 {like\textsubscript{this}}
and have a look at the bookmark.
fixltx2e
as one of the first packages. It has some incompatibilities (See this post) that can be solved in this way. I have been almost 1 hour debugging such a problem ( yes, my code was long, but even ).
Oct 28, 2015 at 13:56
This is included in the fixltx2e package:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fixltx2e}
\begin{document}
like\textsubscript{this}
\end{document}
Interestingly (?), there's a \textsuperscript
command already in LaTeX.
This is included already in the KOMA-Script bundle. If you want to typeset chemical formulas, have a look at the mchem package.
(Thanks to Caramdir for those last two.)
fixltx2e
package. But he's also used the hyperref
package. Is there a redundancy somewhere or am I missing something?
Oct 15, 2012 at 17:42
hyperref
then you might want to do it like ..." So if you are already using hyperref and you want the subscript in headers, use his solution. Otherwise, this one ought to work.
Oct 15, 2012 at 19:17
Actual solution in LaTeX
Just write like\textsubscript{this}
You do not need preamble fixes anymore. Example:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
like\textsubscript{this}
\end{document}
Because all the fixes of package fixltx2e
were enabled by default in the LaTeX format in 2015, the odd lack of this "expectable" command in LaTeX kernel is now history.
Old story
Just for the record: Before of the already cited fixltx2e
package (now obsolete), the command \textsubscript
was also supplied by exactly the same macro by the little package subscript
(no longer in TeX Live):
\DeclareRobustCommand*\textsubscript[1]{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\newcommand{\@textsubscript}[1]{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
But this command is still accessible in the changes
packages that is actually the best option since is still in both MiKTeX and TeXLive.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{changes} % Not needed since 2015
\begin{document}
like\textsubscript{this}
\end{document}
Another option could be a simpler user macro without \makeatletter
stuff. To set the subscript size, the relsize
package could help:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{relsize}
\def\textsubscript#1{\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\textscale{.6}{#1}}}}}
\begin{document}
\huge a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\Large a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\normalsize a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\small a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\footnotesize a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\tiny a\textsubscript{th} A\textsubscript{th}\par
\end{document}
fixltx2e
, I mention the older package subscript
. I have not seen any mention to this package in any other answer. (and yes, I know that the command is exactly the same in both packages, I said "just for the record" for this reason...).
If you don't want to install additional packages you can use the following syntax:
like $_{\text{this}}$
.
This will only require the use of one of the ams packages, for example amsmath
, which is standard for most latex installations.
Alternatively, you can define a command \textunderscript
in the beginning of your document:
\newcommand{\textunderscript}[1]{$_{\text{#1}}$}
\text
needs the amstext
package: perhaps you are thinking of \textup
?
a_1
and it results in an error.
Mar 5, 2017 at 12:00
a\textunderscript{1}
. But, please, take a look at the Fran's answer.
LaTeX provides \raisebox{<len>}{<stuff>}
(based on TeX's \raise
) which raises (and boxes) <stuff>
by <len>
. A negative <len>
drops the contents:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
It's easy to make subscripts in math mode: $a_i$.
How do I make a subscript outside math environment,
like\raisebox{-.4ex}{\scriptsize this}?
\end{document}
Since I've always been bugged by the fact that LaTeX's sscripts need math mode (setting normal text inside math mode have issues with LuaTeX's directionality), motivated by this question, I "stole" the subscript/superscript code from ConTeXt which is set entirely in text mode, with quick hacks to get it work with plain TeX (needs pdftex/luatex though), it is here for now, if there is interest may be it can be turned into some package.
\lohi
, to set sub and superscripts simultaneously.
Sep 3, 2010 at 12:56
Here, I provide the subscript equivalent of this answer, Superscript outside math mode. I show how the subscript depth may be set, as well as the subscript size, using my stackengine
package.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fixltx2e}
\usepackage{stackengine}
\newcommand\textsub[1]{\stackengine{-.5ex}{}{\scriptsize#1}{O}{l}{F}{F}{L}}
\begin{document}
\noindent
a\textsubscript{th}A\textsubscript{th}\\
a\textsub{th}A\textsub{th}\\
\renewcommand\textsub[1]{\stackengine{-.4ex}{}{\footnotesize#1}{O}{l}{F}{F}{L}}
a\textsub{th}A\textsub{th}\\
\renewcommand\textsub[1]{\stackengine{-.5ex}{}{\tiny#1}{O}{l}{F}{F}{L}}
a\textsub{th}A\textsub{th}\\
\end{document}
stackengine
work without it?
\textsubscript
for comparison in row 1. The stackengine
package does not need it.
May 20, 2015 at 0:46
stackengine
interesting for many my needs, but I still learning how to use it. Implementation of \textsubscript
and \textsupercsript
and combination of both are my first ongoing experimetns with it.
The way I do it is by using mathrm inside math environment:
$\mathrm{like_{this}}$
If you use the $\text{}$
version and you have selected a different font (other than roman serif) then $\textnormal{}$
matches the font of the document. If you are using the default fonts, \text{}
will work great.
I get this done by using the mhchem
package. It's normally used for writing chemical formulas, but you can use it for this problem, too.
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
\begin{document}
\ce{like_{this}}
\end{document}
mhchem
doesn't print spaces when you put them in the subscript part. To get the spaces in the subscript part, you'll have to escape them using backslashes:
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
\begin{document}
\ce{like_{this\ and\ this\ and\ this}}
\end{document}
I am new to LaTeX but I have learnt reading the error messages they help a lot with the solution itself. That is where I found that without $
before and after your subscript function LaTeX would give your errors after quick build.
Like$_{this}$
Use $
to start and end the section of your command without these the math commands of subscript and superscript won't work. You don't need any additional packages for using these commands.
_{•}
for subscript
^{•}
for superscript