I usually love my .latexmkrc settings. However I am trying to play with Template Toolkit to build a LaTeX file, then compile it with latexmk (all of this inside a perl script) and thus I would like to use the default latexmk settings (i.e. no preview continuously etc).

I would like to keep my .latexmkrc for personal use, therefore I am looking for a way to tell latexmk to ignore my $HOME/.latexmkrc file (via the -r flag?). Is this possible?


A belated answer: A new version of latexmk does what was asked for. This is v. 4.27a at


Just invoke latexmk with the option -norc, and it will omit reading all its standard initialization files (system, user, and current directory). The -r option still works, so you use a customized initialization file.


This isn't possible using the -r <rcfile> option, because it doesn't override the loading of $HOME/.latexmkrc but this file is loaded in addition. Multiple -r options can be given and all of these config files are loaded in the given order.

One possibility to stop latexmk in your perl script to read $HOME/.latexmkrc is to temporary change the HOME variable and to change the current directory away from $HOME (because latexmk also looks for a .latexmkrc in the current directory.

Something like:

# Perl code:
$ENV{HOME} = '/dev/null';
system("latexmk ...");

If you need the correct HOME anywhere else after this lines simply save it away and restore it afterwards.

  • Worked beautifully, thanks. I really should have thought about that; got too focused on latexmk flags to think outside the box. – Joel Berger Feb 6 '11 at 21:10
  • Now that I am on that track, a further idea would be to localize $ENV{'HOME'} to a block before calling latexmk. Then the home variable will be restored afterwards automatically. ...;{ local $ENV{'HOME'}; system( 'latexmk', '-pdf', $filename ); } ... – Joel Berger Feb 6 '11 at 21:14
  • @Joel: I know that. I just wanted to keep the Perl code minimal. – Martin Scharrer Feb 6 '11 at 21:16
  • No slight intended. Call it a post for the future reader. – Joel Berger Feb 6 '11 at 21:37
  • @Joel: No problem, wasn't meant like that. – Martin Scharrer Feb 6 '11 at 21:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.