5

I want to use ProbXpos for example to position tic marks and to position line ends. It seems to calculate as I intend, but how can I use the calculated value? The example below prints a sample result value. If I un-comment the commented lines it won't even compile.

Also -- minor point -- some is there a ln 10 function? Doesn't work for me.

\documentclass{article} %maybe a better one?
\usepackage{tikz}
\newcommand{\ProbXpos}[1]{\pgfmathparse{ln(#1/(1-#1))/ln 10}\pgfmathresult }
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (0,1) node {\ProbXpos{0.1} result prints ok} ;
%   \draw (\ProbXpos{.0001},0) -- (\ProbXpos{0.999},0) 
%                   node    {cannot use result numerically} ;
\end{tikzpicture}  
\end{document}
|improve this question
  • 1
    ln10 function? ln is a e base logarithm. The usual convention is ln only. – jpayansomet Mar 28 '13 at 22:14
  • 1
    @jpayansomet ln 10 as in the logarithm of the base 10? It's called log10(x), or is the constant value of ln(10) actually meant? – Qrrbrbirlbel Mar 28 '13 at 22:22
  • I don't know. Usually, you can use ln like logarithm base e (neperian number), neperian logarithm. In fact, ln(10) is a constant, neperian logarithm of 10 = 2,302585... – jpayansomet Mar 28 '13 at 22:32
  • Thanks -- log10(x) does the trick. Dividing by ln(10) as I was doing is a synthetic way to find the 10-logarithm. – Charles Brenner Mar 28 '13 at 22:47
8

Maybe you are interested in making ProbXpos in a function that can be used inside a coordinate.

The extra pair of braces are needed as ProbXpos(…) contains parentheses itself.

You could also use a definition as in

\newcommand{\ProbXpos}[1]{{log10(#1/(1-#1))}}

which can be used inside a coordinate, too.
But it can not be modified, i.e. (2*\ProbXpos{…}, 0), because it already contains the braces.

Then again, we could leave out the extra pair of braces, but then we need to use { } in the coordinate.

Code (declare function variant)

\documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={ProbXpos(\x)=log10(\x/(1-\x));}]% could be global …
    \draw (0,1) node {\pgfmathparse{ProbXpos(0.1)}\pgfmathresult\ result prints ok} ;
    \draw ({ProbXpos(.0001)},0) -- ({ProbXpos(0.9999)},0);
\end{tikzpicture}  
\end{document}

Code (PGF math function)

\documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
\makeatletter
\pgfmathdeclarefunction{ProbXpos}{1}{%
    \begingroup
        \pgfmathparse{log10(#1/(1-#1))}%
        \pgf@x=\pgfmathresult pt\relax
        \pgfmathreturn\pgf@x
    \endgroup
}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
    \draw (0,1) node {\pgfmathparse{ProbXpos(0.1)}\pgfmathresult\ result prints ok} ;
    \draw ({ProbXpos(.0001)},0) -- ({ProbXpos(0.9999)},0);
\end{tikzpicture}  
\end{document}

Output (declare function/PGF math function)

enter image description here

Code (LaTeX macro)

\documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
\newcommand{\ProbXpos}[1]{log10(#1/(1-#1))}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
    \draw (0,1) node {\ProbXpos{0.1} result prints ok} ;
    \draw ({\ProbXpos{.0001}},0) -- ({\ProbXpos{0.999}},0);
\end{tikzpicture}  
\end{document}

Output (LaTeX macro)

enter image description here

|improve this answer
  • Thanks. That seems to be what I want. I'll need to study it a lot more. So far my testing gives haphazard results -- picture usually mixed up -- but I did manage to draw a version of the line one time. By the way I'm on Windows -- maybe not the most natural platform for this purpose. – Charles Brenner Mar 28 '13 at 23:52
2

there may be a more tikz-way but it works to move the assignment out of the path syntax.

  \documentclass{article} %maybe a better one?
    \usepackage{tikz}
    \newcommand{\ProbXpos}[2]{\pgfmathparse{ln(#2/(1-#2))/ln 10}\let#1\pgfmathresult }
    \begin{document}
    \begin{tikzpicture}
\ProbXpos\tmpa{.0001}
\ProbXpos\tmpb{0.999}
    \draw (0,1) node {\ProbXpos\tmp{0.1}\tmp result prints ok} ;
       \draw (\tmpa,0) -- (\tmpb,0) 
                       node    {cannot use result numerically} ;
    \end{tikzpicture}  
    \end{document}
|improve this answer
  • Thanks, that is great. I assume that understanding why it is better involves understanding the underlying pgf that Tikz is built on. I accidently posted before adding a further aspect of my question -- I'd like to make a set of tic marks whose positions are calculated by using ProbXpos in a \foreach loop. Therefore I am interested in the "more tikz-way" if anyone can supply it. – Charles Brenner Mar 28 '13 at 22:41
  • See @Qrrbrbirlbel's answer I think he may have an advantage over me of having used Tikz before:-) – David Carlisle Mar 28 '13 at 22:58
1

Variant from Qrrbrbirlbel's solution with \pgfmath@smuggleone\pgfmathresult:

\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage{tikz}
\makeatletter
\pgfmathdeclarefunction{ProbXpos}{1}{%
\begingroup
\pgfmathparse{ln(#1/(1-#1))/ln 10}%
\pgfmath@smuggleone\pgfmathresult
\endgroup 
}%
\makeatother

\begin{document}
\pgfmathparse{ProbXpos(0.999)}\pgfmathresult

\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (ProbXpos{.0001},0) -- (ProbXpos{0.9999},0)  ;
%or
\draw ({ProbXpos(.0001)},-1) -- ({ProbXpos(0.9999)},-1);
\end{tikzpicture}  
\end{document}

enter image description here

|improve this answer
  • That is very helpful too, as it shows me how I can convert ProbXpos() to a display value. Thank you for it. – Charles Brenner Apr 3 '13 at 6:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.