When I try to do the following:

 Hello \verb{foo}.                                                                                                     

i.e. use braces as a delimiter for \verb I get the following error:

! LaTeX Error: \verb ended by end of line.

Is there a reason why you have to use | or + or some other delimiter? The documentation I found online suggests any delimiter (other than *) should work. But curly braces don't seem to work.

  • 2
    TeXnically speaking, { and } are not delimiters. They have a different catcode. If they are converted to active chars then things are bound to break.
    – percusse
    Apr 1, 2013 at 17:00
  • @percusse: You don't need to define { and } to be active to use them as delimiters. For example, in ConTeXt, you may use \type{...} for verbatim text. Of course, LaTeX like \type|..| or \type+...+ also works. Ditto for ConTeXt packages like filter and vim module that work with verbatim text.
    – Aditya
    Apr 1, 2013 at 17:03
  • @Aditya I might be wrong but I think verb defines the next char to be active to collect the content in between. Baaah I meant the \dospecials
    – percusse
    Apr 1, 2013 at 17:05
  • @percusse: I haven't looked to LaTeX's definition, but ConTeXt does not make a character active. Basically, it grabs the next char, checks if it is \bgroup; if so uses one definition, else uses 2nd definition. See, for example, this implementation in t-filter.
    – Aditya
    Apr 1, 2013 at 17:10
  • As @Aditya says, you can set up to grab verbatim material in braces: xparse does this as the v-type argument.
    – Joseph Wright
    Apr 1, 2013 at 17:28

2 Answers 2


Here's the relevant code from latex.ltx

    \verb@eol@error \let\do\@makeother \dospecials

The \verb command doesn't have any argument; it does some preliminary work and then hands control to \@verb or \@sverb (the latter if it was called as \verb*.

\def\@verb{\@vobeyspaces \frenchspacing \@sverb}

Here we see that \@verb simply makes the space active (already defined to expand to \space) and sets \frenchspacing for keeping all spaces equal; then it calls \@sverb

     \@latex@error{\noexpand\verb illegal in command argument}\@ehc}%

Now \@sverb reads the first token (the delimiter) and makes it active. Then it defines a check macro for getting out of troubles in case \verb is called as the argument to a command.

Finally it defines the active delimiter to be \verb@egroup; upon finding and expanding it, all the special settings for verbatim mode will be undone.

Thus \verb{xyz{ is legal (try it) but \verb{xyz} isn't. The code might be changed to take care of \verb{xyz}; however, one of the main points of \verb is allowing unbalanced braces in the verbatim text, so there's not so much to gain with that.

  • Thanks! I guess I wanted \verb to behave like a standard latex command. Obviously { and } are different characters. I never thought that you might want to have unbalanced braces.
    – user28291
    Apr 1, 2013 at 18:14

You have to use matching "delimiters". And, in this instance, { does not match }. \verb grabs the first (non-* character) and makes it active, in order to match it with the same character at the of the verbatim content, thereby defining a scope over which the verbatim protocol acts.

The choice between using * or not is based on the fact that LaTeX sometimes provides a starred variant of a command. In terms of \verb, this is also the case as it executes \@ifstar (from latex.ltx):

    \verb@eol@error \let\do\@makeother \dospecials

The listings package provides a similar verbatim-style macro using lstlistings (for the environment) and \lstinline (for the in-line usage). From the listings documentation (section 4.2 Typesetting listings, p 25) it notes that you have to provide the <character>...<same character> pattern:

\lstinline[<key=value list>]<character><source code><same character>

Only recently has an "experimental" \lstinline[..]{...} been provided. However, for similar reasons and making the coding behind it more complicated, using it in the traditional sense should be adequate.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .