I'm using LaTeX as a final build step from a specific legal source (a code of laws) that already has numbering - which is not entirely logical. So, the auto-stepping section & subsection numbering does not match the numbering of the laws and really cannot do so programmatically.

So, I would love to completely disable LaTeX/XeTeX's 'counter' system and specify explicitly every single section & subsection number. Is this possible?

Update: currently using the 'article' document class, and here's a chunk of what I'm working on (with non-functional calls to \setcounter)

  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SE! Which document class do you use? – Mico Apr 19 '13 at 14:50
  • Currently using article, here's the start of the doc: gist.github.com/tmcw/5420843 – tmcw Apr 19 '13 at 14:51
  • erh, \setcounter{secnumdepth}{-10} to disable numbering completely? – daleif Apr 19 '13 at 14:56
  • @daleif -- I think what the OP wants is to set the sectioning-related counters directly, rather than to disable numbering entirely. However, I may be wrong. – Mico Apr 19 '13 at 14:59
  • @mico To me it sounded more like the numbers was added as a part of the title. – daleif Apr 19 '13 at 15:05

The following code -- to be inserted in your document's preamble -- disables the stepping of all sectioning-related counters (not just the section and subsection counters). It is up to you, then, to provide your own counter-setting directives.

\makeatletter  % remove the \refstepcounter directive from \@sect macro

Addendum: I just had a chance to look at the code you posted on github. A quick remark: You can't set "1-135" as the value of a counter variable; it has to be an integer. If you need to have the subsection "number" appear as "1-135" (where, presumably, 1 is the section number), you should issue the command


in the preamble and then simply set the subsection counter to 135 before invoking the \subsection command.

| improve this answer | |
  • Can subsections have decimals? If one wanted a section like 29A or a subsection like 30.32, that's not possible? – tmcw Apr 19 '13 at 15:48
  • @tmcw - would 30.32 be the "number" of a subsection or of a subsubsection (where 30 would be a subsection number)? Please advise. – Mico Apr 19 '13 at 15:55
  • 30.32 would be the number of a section: for instance, sections can go like '30, 30.1, 30.2, 31' in which 30.1 are siblings, not children, of 31. It's an odd system, but unfortunately not mine to change. – tmcw Apr 19 '13 at 16:06
  • 3
    @tmcw - Thanks for clarifying this issue. Given the very much "free-format" nature of section and subsection numbers, I'd say it's probably easiest to use "unnumbered" sectioning commands -- \section*, \subsection*, etc -- and to supply the desired sectioning number as part of the argument of the sectioning command. E.g., you might write \section*{30.32\quad <Title of section>}. – Mico Apr 19 '13 at 16:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.