3

I am trying to draw a big commutative diagram for my paper. The diagram is quite easy, it looks like a 4 by 8 matrix but the labels of the vertices and those of the arrows are quite large. For this reason the diagram doesn't fit the page space.

I am using the package picture and use "tiny" to make them smaller.

My question is if changing the package is possible to rearrange things so that the diagram can fit in the page?

Otherwise, what should I do? Is any possibility to import the diagram from other editors?

Thank you in advance!

Here is the code

{\tiny
\begin{tikzpicture}
  \matrix (m) [matrix of math nodes, row sep=1em,column sep=1em,minimum width=1em]
  {
     T^{xzx\inv}(T^{x}(T^{r}(M\ot N))) & &
     T^{xzx\inv}(T^{xr}(M\ot N)) &   
     T^{xzx\inv}(T^{xrx^{-1}}(T^{x}(M\ot N))) \\%1
    T^{xz}(T^{r}(M\ot N)) & &  & T^{xzx\inv}(T^{xrx^{-1}}(T^{x}(M)\ot T^{x}(N))) \\%2
    T^{xzr} (M\ot N) & & T^{xzrx^{-1}} (T^{x}(M\ot N))&  T^{xzrx^{-1}} (T^{x}(M)\ot T^{x}(N)) \\%3
     T^{x}(T^{zr} (M\ot N) )&  & T^{xr'x^{-1}} (T^{xlx^{-1}}(T^{x}(M\ot N))  & T^{xr'x^{-1}} (T^{xlx^{-1}}(T^{x}(M)\ot T^{x}(N))) \\%4
     T^{x}(T^{r'}(T^{l}(M\ot N)))&  A & T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{xl}(M\ot N))  &   T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{xlx^{-1}}(T^{x}(M))\ot T^{xlx^{-1}}(T^{x}(N)))\\%5 
    T^{x}(T^{r'}(T^{l}(M)\ot T^{l}(N))) & B & T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{x}(T^{l}(M\ot N))) & T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{xl}(M)\ot T^{xl} (N))   \\%6
     T^{x}(T^{r'}(M\ot N))) &   T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{x}(T^{l}(M)& T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{x}(T^{l}(M)\ot T^{x}(T^{l} (N))))\\%7 
     T^{xr'}(M\ot N)& T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{x}(M\ot N)) & T^{xr'x^{-1}}(T^{x}(M)\ot T^{x}(N)) \\%8
     };
     \path[-stealth]
     (m-1-1) edge node [above] {$T^{xzx^{-1}}((T^{x,r}_{2})_{M\ot N})$}(m-1-3)%A1horiz
     (m-1-3) edge node [above] {$T^{xzx^{-1}}((T^{xrx^{-1},x}_{2})^{-1}_{M\ot N})$}(m-1-4)
     (m-8-1) edge node [below] {$(T^{xr'x^{-1}, x}_{2})^{-1}_{M\ot N}$}(m-8-2)%A8horiz
      (m-8-2) edge node [below] {$T^{xr'x^{-1}}((T^{x}_{2})^{M, N})$}(m-8-3)
        (m-3-1) edge [dashed] node  [above] {$(T^{xzrx^{-1}, x}_{2})_{M\ot N}$}(m-3-3)%A8horiz
        (m-3-3) edge [dashed] node [above] {$T^{xzrx^{-1}}((T^{x}_{2})^{M, N})$}(m-3-4)
       % (m-4-1) edge [dashed] node  [above] {hello}(m-4-2)%A8horiz
        (m-4-2) edge [dashed] node [above] {}(m-4-3)
       % (m-5-1) edge [dashed] node  [above] {}(m-5-2)%A8horiz
        (m-5-3) edge [dashed] node [above] {}(m-6-4)
        %(m-6-1) edge [dashed] node  [above] {}(m-6-2)%A8horiz
       % (m-7-3) edge [dashed] node  [above] {$\mu^{l}_{M\ot N}$}(m-7-1)%A8horiz
        (m-7-2) edge [dashed] node [above] {}(m-7-3)
      (m-8-2) edge  node [above] {}(m-8-3)
      %%%%% verticals\
       (m-1-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-2-1)%vertical
       (m-2-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-3-1)%vertical
       (m-3-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-4-1)%
       (m-4-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-5-1)%
       (m-5-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-6-1)%
     (m-6-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-7-1)%
     (m-7-1) edge node [left] {$$} (m-8-1)%vertical
     (m-1-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-2-3)%vertical
       (m-2-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-3-3)%vertical
       (m-3-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-4-3)%
       (m-4-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-5-3)%
       (m-5-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-6-3)%
     (m-6-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-7-3)
     (m-7-3) edge node [left] {$$} (m-8-3)
     (m-1-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-3-1)%
        (m-1-3) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-3-2)
        (m-3-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-4-2)
          (m-4-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-5-2)
          (m-5-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-6-2)
           (m-6-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-7-2)
            (m-7-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-8-2)
            %(m-6-2) edge [dashed] node [left] {$$} (m-7-2)
            ;
  \end{tikzpicture}

not perfect diagram yet

|improve this question
  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.sx! Can you add the code you're using so that we can play with it? And, if you have some time, please give a look at our TeX.SX starter guide – egreg May 12 '13 at 19:49
  • The code doesn't compile; I can guess what \inv and \ot stand for, but I get No shape named m-4-2 is known – egreg May 12 '13 at 20:17
  • I'd also like if you consider the package tikz-cd for drawing commutative diagrams! – kan May 12 '13 at 20:18
  • @ egreg It should be m-4-3 instead of m-4-2. The diagram is not perfect I was writing it today but Ingave up once I ve noticed that does not fit the page. The ideea is that the diagram consists of this 8 by 4 matrix with long labeled arrows inside between various terms. Yes, \ot and \inv are shortcuts for otimes and power -1. – Mathuser May 12 '13 at 20:22
  • I will write tomorrow the exact diagram and replace the code. Another option would be to brake it in two smaller diagrams. – Mathuser May 12 '13 at 20:38
2

You could take your picture and translate is with the standalone-class. Something like this:

\documentclass{standalone} 
%packeges you need for your picture
\begin{document}
%Your picture definition
\end{document}

This creates a document with the size of your picture.

Then you could include this image with \includegraphics.

Remark after your edit:

You may also work with \includestandalone.

\documentclass{scrartcl} 
\usepackage{tikz} 
\usepackage{standalone} 
%other packages
\begin{document}
%your content before the picture
\includestandalone[width=\textwidth]{your-standalone-document}
%your content after the picture
\end{document}
|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.